Merge pull request #187 from msgpack/v07-perf-test

Adjust loop cycles to make TravisCI test faster and more stable

Author: komamitsu

msgpack-core/src/test/scala/org/msgpack/core/MessagePackerTest.scala

@@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ class MessagePackerTest extends MessagePackSpec {
 
     "improve the performance via reset method" taggedAs("reset") in {
 
-
       val N = 1000
       val t = time("packer", repeat = 10) {
         block("no-buffer-reset") {

msgpack-jackson/src/test/java/org/msgpack/jackson/dataformat/benchmark/MessagePackDataformatHugeDataBenchmarkTest.java

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 import java.util.List;
 
 public class MessagePackDataformatHugeDataBenchmarkTest extends MessagePackDataformatTestBase {
-    private static final int ELM_NUM = 1500000;
+    private static final int ELM_NUM = 1000000;
     private static final int SAMPLING_COUNT = 4;
     private final ObjectMapper origObjectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
     private final ObjectMapper msgpackObjectMapper = new ObjectMapper(new MessagePackFactory());

msgpack-jackson/src/test/java/org/msgpack/jackson/dataformat/benchmark/MessagePackDataformatPojoBenchmarkTest.java

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 import java.util.List;
 
 public class MessagePackDataformatPojoBenchmarkTest extends MessagePackDataformatTestBase {
-    private static final int LOOP_MAX = 8000;
+    private static final int LOOP_MAX = 1000;
     private static final int LOOP_FACTOR = 50;
     private static final int SAMPLING_COUNT = 4;
     private static final List<NormalPojo> pojos = new ArrayList<NormalPojo>(LOOP_MAX);