You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: src/v2/guide/comparison.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -224,5 +224,5 @@ In Polymer, the team has also made its data-binding system very limited in order
224
224
225
225
Riot 3.0 provides a similar component-based development model (which is called a "tag" in Riot), with a minimal and beautifully designed API. Riot and Vue probably share a lot in design philosophies. However, despite being a bit heavier than Riot, Vue does offer some significant advantages:
226
226
227
-
- Better performance. Riot [traverses a DOM tree](http://riotjs.com/compare/#virtual-dom-vs-expressions-binding) rather than using a virtual DOM, so suffers from the same performance issues as AngularJS.
227
+
- Better performance. Riot [traverses a DOM tree](https://v3.riotjs.now.sh/compare/#virtual-dom-vs-expressions-binding) rather than using a virtual DOM, so suffers from the same performance issues as AngularJS.
228
228
- More mature tooling support. Vue provides official support for [webpack](https://github.com/vuejs/vue-loader) and [Browserify](https://github.com/vuejs/vueify), while Riot relies on community support for build system integration.
0 commit comments