Commit a18e42b
committed
SI-9298 Fix erasure of value classes in Java
Value classes that appear in signatures of Java defined methods
should not be erased to the underlying type.
Before this change, we'd get a `ClassCastException`, as the Scala
call site would unbox the value class despite the fact the Java
recipient would expect the boxed representation.
I've tested this for primitive and object wrapped types in parameter
and return position.1 parent f635ba9 commit a18e42b
File tree
5 files changed
+29
-0
lines changed- src/reflect/scala/reflect/internal/transform
- test/files/run
- t9298b
- t9298
5 files changed
+29
-0
lines changedLines changed: 2 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
254 | 254 | | |
255 | 255 | | |
256 | 256 | | |
| 257 | + | |
| 258 | + | |
257 | 259 | | |
258 | 260 | | |
259 | 261 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | + | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | + | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | + | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | + | |
| 8 | + | |
0 commit comments