@@ -535,36 +535,36 @@ Running the Code
535535The user can then run the code by calling:
536536
537537.. code-block:: bash
538-
538+
539539 python code/convolutional_mlp.py
540540
541- The following output was obtained with the default parameters on a Xeon E5450
542- CPU clocked at 3.00GHz and using flags 'floatX=float32':
541+ The following output was obtained with the default parameters on a Core i7-2600K
542+ CPU clocked at 3.40GHz and using flags 'floatX=float32':
543543
544544.. code-block:: bash
545545
546546 Optimization complete.
547- Best validation score of 0.910000 % obtained at iteration 16099 ,with test
548- performance 0.930000 %
549- The code for file convolutional_mlp.py ran for 755.32m
547+ Best validation score of 0.910000 % obtained at iteration 17800 ,with test
548+ performance 0.920000 %
549+ The code for file convolutional_mlp.py ran for 380.28m
550550
551551Using a GeForce GTX 285, we obtained the following:
552552
553553.. code-block:: bash
554554
555555 Optimization complete.
556- Best validation score of 0.910000 % obtained at iteration 20099 ,with test
556+ Best validation score of 0.910000 % obtained at iteration 15500 ,with test
557557 performance 0.930000 %
558- The code for file convolutional_mlp.py ran for 47.96m
558+ The code for file convolutional_mlp.py ran for 46.76m
559559
560560And similarly on a GeForce GTX 480:
561561
562562.. code-block:: bash
563563
564564 Optimization complete.
565- Best validation score of 0.910000 % obtained at iteration 18499 ,with test
566- performance 0.910000 %
567- The code for file convolutional_mlp.py ran for 43.09m
565+ Best validation score of 0.910000 % obtained at iteration 16400 ,with test
566+ performance 0.930000 %
567+ The code for file convolutional_mlp.py ran for 32.52m
568568
569569Note that the discrepancies in validation and test error (as well as iteration
570570count) are due to different implementations of the rounding mechanism in
0 commit comments