Skip to content

Conversation

@connorjclark
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link
Contributor

@brendankenny brendankenny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

b914ea1

lol, commit to master of the opposite of this PR :P

@connorjclark
Copy link
Collaborator Author

b914ea1

lol, commit to master of the opposite of this PR :P

ooo guess i messed up the blame hunting

Copy link
Collaborator

@patrickhulce patrickhulce left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

core(misc):

I believe that's what just misc: is for, no? 😆 more on this below though...

I have some faint memory of someone using the text of the status log messages to provide significant functionality (might have been DevTools progress bar? 😬) so this might be more breaking than we think.

Buuuuuut that's probably a bad idea for whoever that was to be doing that, so I'm on board :)

Maybe we can just call it out a bit more in release notes? core(logging): change log messages for gathering and trace retrieval or something?

@patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator

patrickhulce commented May 22, 2019

I have some faint memory of someone using the text of the status log messages to provide significant functionality

(Also, the fact that in our docs we tell users to programmatically do something based on a particular log message isn't a great sign for its non-breakingness)

@connorjclark connorjclark changed the title core(misc): align terms used in logs for gathering/auditing steps core(logging): change log messages for gathering and trace retrieval May 22, 2019
@connorjclark connorjclark merged commit bd7c66d into master May 23, 2019
@brendankenny brendankenny deleted the align-logs-gather-audit branch May 23, 2019 20:06
@brendankenny
Copy link
Contributor

I have some faint memory of someone using the text of the status log messages to provide significant functionality (might have been DevTools progress bar? 😬) so this might be more breaking than we think.

This might already be picked up on the devtools side, but if not, pretty sure @patrickhulce is right on this. e.g.

https://github.com/ChromeDevTools/devtools-frontend/blob/072e6f877f246a9a10b98891d2f75c473dfa2a04/front_end/audits2/Audits2StatusView.js#L265-L286

https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/blink/web_tests/http/tests/devtools/audits2/audits2-successful-run-expected.txt

etc

@connorjclark connorjclark mentioned this pull request May 23, 2019
@patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator

Unrelated beautiful gem over in "expected" results.

main-thread-tasks: ERROR Something went wrong with recording the trace over your page load. Please run Lighthouse again. (NO_FCP)

https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/blink/web_tests/http/tests/devtools/audits2/audits2-successful-run-expected.txt?l=340

@connorjclark
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Unrelated beautiful gem over in "expected" results.

main-thread-tasks: ERROR Something went wrong with recording the trace over your page load. Please run Lighthouse again. (NO_FCP)

cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/blink/web_tests/http/tests/devtools/audits2/audits2-successful-run-expected.txt?l=340

Ah, that settles it. We expect NO_FCP. Let's close all future NO_FCP issues as WAI :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants