Resolutions not reflected in the spec yet

[lanthaler]

Some resolutions do not have an issue (or the issue is in the RDF WG tracker) so I'll keep track of them here instead:

• RESOLUTION: Add explanatory text to the JSON-LD API specification explaining the risks of the useNativeTypes flag and how to do proper conversion to/from native types using the to/from RDF method call.
• Blank nodes as graph names are now supported in RDF. We should update our spec accordingly.
• The syntax spec now uses the term "graph" instead of "JSON-LD graph". The API spec should be updated accordingly
• Not all comments on 4c9395f have been addressed yet

[lanthaler]

@sandhawke @gkellogg @msporny @dlongley What exactly do we need to add to the Data Round Tripping section?

[lanthaler]

From David Booth:

• s/Transformation from JSON-LD to RDF/Interpreting JSON-LD as RDF/g
• s/extracted as RDF/interpreted as RDF/
• s/Convert to RDF Algorithm/Algorithm to Convert JSON-LD to RDF Abstract Syntax/
• s/JSON-LD to RDF converters/ JSON-LD processors / ==> JSON-LD-as-RDF interpreters
• s/Transforming this to RDF/Transforming this to RDF abstract syntax/

[lanthaler]

This issue is now obsolete as all changes requested by @dbooth-boston are now handled in PR #287.