Skip to content

Conversation

@wolfy1339
Copy link
Member

BREAKING CHANGE: Drop support for NodeJS v14, v16

BREAKING CHANGE: Drop support for NodeJS v14, v16
@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 added Type: Feature New feature or request Type: Breaking change Used to note any change that requires a major version bump labels Jun 3, 2023
Copy link

@styfle styfle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

styfle

This comment was marked as resolved.

Comment on lines +27 to +36
// To-Do: Figure out why the objects are not strictly equal
expect(JSON.stringify(error.response.data.errors)).toStrictEqual(
JSON.stringify([
{
resource: "Label",
code: "invalid",
field: "color",
},
]),
);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the same situation as in octokit/core.js#563

octokit/core.js#563 (comment)

This will need to be handled in a follow-up issue

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

 FAIL  test/scenarios/errors.test.ts
  ● api.github.com › (#684) errors-test

    expect(received).toStrictEqual(expected) // deep equality

    Expected: [{"code": "invalid", "field": "color", "resource": "Label"}]
    Received: serializes to the same string

      25 |           `Validation Failed: {"resource":"Label","code":"invalid","field":"color"}`,
      26 |         );
    > 27 |         expect(error.response.data.errors).toStrictEqual([
         |                                            ^
      28 |           {
      29 |             resource: "Label",
      30 |             code: "invalid",

      at test/scenarios/errors.test.ts:27:44

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addressed in octokit/core.js#588

@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2023 22:30
@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 merged commit 5429dfd into main Jul 11, 2023
@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 deleted the beta branch July 11, 2023 14:08
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 20.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

released Type: Breaking change Used to note any change that requires a major version bump Type: Feature New feature or request

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants