Skip to content

Commit fb20afa

Browse files
committed
Typos in readme
1 parent 707f16d commit fb20afa

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ they do better?". After all, Joda-Time already provides a pretty comprehensive
4848
set of tools for dealing with time-related concepts. Turns out, it's a tad more
4949
complicated than it has to be. Also, a few concepts have faulty designs which
5050
lead to hard to fix bugs and misuse. You can see the birds-eye view of changes
51-
and some of the rationale on the authors' (Stephen Colebourne) blog:
51+
and some of the rationale on the author's (Stephen Colebourne) blog:
5252

5353
* [what's wrong with Joda-Time](http://blog.joda.org/2009/11/why-jsr-310-isn-joda-time_4941.html),
5454
* [when you should use Java-Time](http://blog.joda.org/2014/07/threeten-backport-vs-joda-time.html)
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ the `Inst` protocol and the Joda-Time types are external to the library.
438438

439439
Java Time introduced a concept of `Clock` - a time entity which can seed the
440440
dates, times and zones. However, there's no built-in facility which would allow
441-
you to influence the date-times create using default constructors ala Joda's
441+
you to influence the date-times created using default constructors ala Joda's
442442
`DateTimeUtils/setCurrentMillisSystem`. Clojure.Java-Time tries to fix that with
443443
the `with-clock` macro and the corresponding `with-clock-fn` function:
444444

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)