docs: improve categorical variables notebook instructions - #750
Closed
W057 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
- Update title and introduction to explain what categorical variables are and the different approaches (one-hot encoding vs SpecialDates) - Add note about the X_df requirement (the example shows a warning because exogenous variables are ignored without X_df) - Fix broken link to long horizon model tutorial - Link to the comprehensive categorical variables tutorial Closes Nixtla#529
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
Author
|
Superseded by #756 which consolidates all documentation fixes into a single PR. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
04_categorical_variables.ipynb) to be more representative of the process:SpecialDatesX_dfis not providedX_dfand accuracy evaluationCloses #529