feat(jwk): add a derive_key method for OKPKey#87
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #87 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 47 47
Lines 2875 2924 +49
Branches 327 335 +8
=========================================
+ Hits 2875 2924 +49
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@azmeuk BTW, I also add a |
lepture
force-pushed
the
feat-okp-derive-key
branch
from
d166084 to
734121d
Compare
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| raise DecodeError("tag does not match") | ||
|
|
||
| cipher = Cipher(AES(dkey), CBC(iv), backend=default_backend()) | ||
| cipher = Cipher(AES(dkey), CBC(iv)) |
Check failure
Code scanning / SonarCloud
Encryption algorithms should be used with secure mode and padding scheme
| raise DecodeError("tag does not match") | ||
|
|
||
| cipher = Cipher(AES(dkey), CBC(iv), backend=default_backend()) | ||
| cipher = Cipher(AES(dkey), CBC(iv)) |
Check failure
Code scanning / SonarCloud
Encryption algorithms should be used with secure mode and padding scheme
azmeuk
left a comment
azmeuk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I did not test the code but just reading it.
LGTM so far. This appears very handy 🙏
|
Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud |
|
3 participants
Feature for #82