-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 230
Hardening suggestions for insecure-kubernetes-deployments / pixeebot/drip-2024-12-19-pixee-python/add-requests-timeouts #68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
DryRun Security SummaryThe code changes address multiple security vulnerabilities across different files, including dependency management, security fixes in the application, and a concerning ransomware implementation that should never be deployed in a production environment. Expand for full summarySummary: The provided code changes cover a range of security-related modifications across multiple files in the "insecure-app" and "insecure-api" projects. The key highlights are:
Files Changed:
Code AnalysisWe ran
|
| fastapi==0.115.5 | ||
| uvicorn==0.32.1 | ||
| uvicorn==0.32.1 | ||
| security==1.3.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reputation Risk: [email protected] has a low reputation score
The package has a low reputation score, consider finding an alternative.
Score factors:
- Low # of releases: 5
- Low # of dependents: 2
- Low # of recent downloads: 3,428
- Low # of stars: 14
Severity: Medium
Status: Open 🔴
Resources:
- How to Find Alternative Packages to Low-Reputation Open Source Packages?
- Identifying Low Reputation Packages: Key Factors and Their Importance
- What is OpenSSF Scorecard?
Take action by replying with an [arnica] command 💬
Actions
Use [arnica] or [a] to interact with the Arnica bot to acknowledge or dismiss code risks.
[arnica] ack <message>
Acknowledge the finding as a valid code risk.
Examples
[arnica] ack looking into it
[a] ack triaged by the security team
[arnica] dismiss <fp|accept|capacity> <message>
Dismiss the risk with a reason.
-
fp: False positive, i.e. the result is incorrect and indicates no actual risk. -
accept: Tolerable risk, i.e. risk severity is lower than what has been reported or is accepted as it stands. -
capacity: No capacity, i.e. leave me alone, please.
Examples
[arnica] dismiss fp test function
[arnica] dismiss accept ChatGPT assures us that we will be just fine
[a] dismiss capacity not enough caffeine to fix it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❌ Jit has detected 2 important findings in this PR that you should review.
The findings are detailed below as separate comments.
It’s highly recommended that you fix these security issues before merge.
| import requests | ||
| from lxml import etree | ||
| from security import safe_requests, safe_command | ||
| import lxml.etree |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Python Semgrep
Potential Xxe Vulnerability With Native Python Xml Libraries
Found use of the native Python XML libraries, which is vulnerable to XML external entity (XXE)
attacks. The Python documentation recommends the 'defusedxml' library instead. Use 'defusedxml'.
See https://github.com/tiran/defusedxml for more information.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "Potential XXE vulnerability with native Python XML libraries" in insecure-app/app.py; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| parser = etree.XMLParser(load_dtd=True, resolve_entities=True) | ||
| tree = etree.fromstring(xml_data.encode(), parser) | ||
| parser = etree.XMLParser(load_dtd=True, resolve_entities=False) | ||
| tree = etree.fromstring(xml_data.encode(), parser, parser=lxml.etree.XMLParser(resolve_entities=False)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Python Semgrep
Potential Xxe Vulnerability With Native Python Xml Libraries
Found use of the native Python XML libraries, which is vulnerable to XML external entity (XXE)
attacks. The Python documentation recommends the 'defusedxml' library instead. Use 'defusedxml'.
See https://github.com/tiran/defusedxml for more information.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "Potential XXE vulnerability with native Python XML libraries" in insecure-app/app.py; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
I've reviewed the recently opened PR (66 - Add timeout to
requestscalls) and have identified some area(s) that could benefit from additional hardening measures.These changes should help prevent potential security vulnerabilities and improve overall code quality.
Thank you for your consideration!
🧚🤖 Powered by Pixeebot
Feedback | Community | Docs