add insecure-ai

[confusedcrib]

No description provided.

[zeropath-ai]

We have finished reviewing your PR. We have found no vulnerabilities.

Reply to this PR with @zeropath-ai followed by a description of what change you want and we'll auto-submit a change to this PR to implement it.

[dryrunsecurity]

DryRun Security Summary

A Flask-based AI code security analysis application with multiple security vulnerabilities spanning network exposure, information disclosure, dependency risks, credential handling, file upload security, development environment configurations, container deployment, and template rendering.

Expand for full summary

Summary: A Flask-based AI code security analysis application with multiple components, including web interface, Dockerfile, Kubernetes deployment, and GitHub Actions workflow, revealing several potential security vulnerabilities across different configuration files.

Security Findings:

1. Network Exposure Risks

   • Application bound to 0.0.0.0:5000, potentially exposing service to unintended network access
   • Hardcoded Gunicorn configuration exposes service on all network interfaces

2. Information Disclosure Vulnerabilities

   • Extensive logging of request details could expose sensitive information
   • Detailed error messages might leak implementation details
   • README and templates provide potentially excessive application architecture insights

3. External Dependency Risks

   • Multiple CDN-loaded resources in templates from various sources
   • Potential supply chain attacks or dependency compromise
   • Possible XSS if CDN is compromised

4. Credential and Secret Handling

   • Kubernetes Secrets base64 encoded (not encrypted)
   • Optional credential flag might allow deployment without authentication
   • API key placeholders in values.yaml with potential insecure management

5. File Upload Security Concerns

   • Minimal ZIP file upload validation
   • Potential race conditions with global dictionaries for analysis results
   • Unvalidated file upload in client-side interface

6. Development Environment Exposure

   • Debug mode explicitly enabled for development
   • Unencrypted HTTP protocol recommended for local development

7. Container and Deployment Risks

   • Using :latest image tag, introducing unpredictable changes
   • No explicit user creation or root privilege dropping in Dockerfile
   • No resource constraints defined in Kubernetes deployment

8. Template and Rendering Risks

   • Potential server-side template injection
   • Unsafe content rendering with {{ content | safe }}
   • No visible CSRF protection mechanisms

View PR in the DryRun Dashboard.

[jit-ci]

❌ Jit has detected 3 important findings in this PR that you should review.
The findings are detailed below as separate comments.
It’s highly recommended that you fix these security issues before merge.

[jit-ci]

Security control: Software Component Analysis Python

Werkzeug Debugger Vulnerable To Remote Execution When Interacting With Attacker Controlled Domain

The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger.

Is fix available? Yes, this issue was fixed in version 3.0.3

Severity: HIGH

Learn more about this issue

---

Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)

You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:

• #jit_ignore_fp Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”
• #jit_ignore_accept Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”
• #jit_ignore_type_in_file Ignore any finding of type "Werkzeug debugger vulnerable to remote execution when interacting with attacker controlled domain" in insecure-ai/requirements.txt; future occurrences will also be ignored.
• #jit_undo_ignore Undo ignore command

[jit-ci]

Security control: Docker Scan

'Apt-Get' Missing '--No-Install-Recommends'

'apt-get' install should use '--no-install-recommends' to minimize image size.

Severity: HIGH

Learn more about this issue

---

Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)

You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:

• #jit_ignore_fp Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”
• #jit_ignore_accept Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”
• #jit_ignore_type_in_file Ignore any finding of type "'apt-get' missing '--no-install-recommends'" in insecure-ai/Dockerfile; future occurrences will also be ignored.
• #jit_undo_ignore Undo ignore command

[jit-ci]

Security control: Docker Scan

Image User Should Not Be 'Root'

Running containers with 'root' user can lead to a container escape situation. It is a best practice to run containers as non-root users, which can be done by adding a 'USER' statement to the Dockerfile.

Severity: HIGH

Learn more about this issue

---

Fix suggestion:

This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.

Suggestion guidelines

• First of all, check if your container is running as a root user. In most of the cases, you can do it by running a command like this: docker run <image> whoami. If it returns root, then you should consider using a non-root user, by following one of the next steps:
  • If a non-root user already exists in your container, consider using it.
  • If not, you can create a new user by adding a USER command to the Dockerfile, with a non-root user as argument, for example: USER <non-root-user-name>.

Suggested change

	FROM python:3.12-slim
	FROM python:3.12-slim
	RUN addgroup --system <group>
	RUN adduser --system <user> --ingroup <group>
	USER <user>:<group>

---

Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)

You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:

• #jit_ignore_fp Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”
• #jit_ignore_accept Ignore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”
• #jit_ignore_type_in_file Ignore any finding of type "Image user should not be 'root'" in insecure-ai/Dockerfile; future occurrences will also be ignored.
• #jit_undo_ignore Undo ignore command