Update app.py 2 #93
Update app.py 2 #93
Conversation
![arnica-github-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/144692?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| sql = request.form['sql'] #oh o | ||
| try: | ||
| # Execute the user's SQL query | ||
| cursor.execute(sql) #oh o | ||
| # Fetch all rows from the query result | ||
| rows = cursor.fetchall() | ||
| # Format the results for display | ||
| if rows: | ||
| output = "Results:\n" + "\n".join(str(row) for row in rows) | ||
| else: | ||
| output = "Query executed successfully, but no results found." | ||
| except Exception as e: | ||
| output = f"SQL Error: {e}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Static Code Analysis Risk: Injection - SQL injection DB cursor execute
User-controlled data from a request is passed to 'execute()'. This could lead to a SQL injection and therefore protected information could be leaked. Instead, use django's QuerySets, which are built with query parameterization and therefore not vulnerable to sql injection. For example, you could use Entry.objects.filter(date=2006).
Severity: Medium
Status: Open 🔴
References:
Take action by replying with an [arnica] command 💬
Actions
Use [arnica] or [a] to interact with the Arnica bot to acknowledge or dismiss code risks.
To acknowledge the finding as a valid code risk:
[arnica] ack <acknowledge additional details>
To dismiss the risk with a reason:
[arnica] dismiss <fp|accept|capacity> <dismissal reason>
Examples
-
[arnica] ack This is a valid risk and im looking into it -
[arnica] dismiss fp Dismissed - Risk Not Accurate: (i.e. False Positive) -
[arnica] dismiss accept Dismiss - Risk Accepted: Allow the risk to exist in the system -
[arnica] dismiss capacity Dismiss - No Capacity: This will need to wait for a future sprint
|
✅ No security or compliance issues detected. Reviewed everything up to a62badc. Security Overview
Detected Code ChangesThe diff is too large to display a summary of code changes. Reply to this PR with |
1 participant
No description provided.