Skip to content

bpo-36121: Override field_size_limit per csv.reader object#12071

Open
remilapeyre wants to merge 2 commits intopython:mainfrom
remilapeyre:override-csv.field_size_limit
Open

bpo-36121: Override field_size_limit per csv.reader object#12071
remilapeyre wants to merge 2 commits intopython:mainfrom
remilapeyre:override-csv.field_size_limit

Conversation

@remilapeyre
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@remilapeyre remilapeyre commented Feb 27, 2019

@remilapeyre remilapeyre force-pushed the override-csv.field_size_limit branch 2 times, most recently from b10f1dc to be2a5ec Compare February 27, 2019 16:09
@remilapeyre remilapeyre force-pushed the override-csv.field_size_limit branch from be2a5ec to f2d530f Compare February 27, 2019 16:10
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ZackerySpytz ZackerySpytz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if this feature will be accepted, but I have some comments.

Comment thread Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2019-02-27-16-53-43.bpo-36121.AbiDLw.rst Outdated
Comment thread Modules/_csv.c Outdated
Comment thread Modules/_csv.c Outdated
Comment thread Modules/_csv.c Outdated
Comment thread Doc/library/csv.rst Outdated
@remilapeyre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks, it took me a while but I made the changes you requested.

@vnmabus
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vnmabus commented Oct 28, 2021

I don't know the typical times for a PR like this one to be accepted, but if it helps to find the motivation to accept it, the original bug was submitted because of this conversation in the Scipy repository: scipy/scipy#9854 (comment)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MaxwellDupre MaxwellDupre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Run of test_csv:
Ran 107 tests in 0.327s
OK
It would be good to add in csv.rst:
Changed in version 3.12

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Jun 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting core review stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants