Skip to content

Conversation

@martintmk
Copy link
Contributor

@martintmk martintmk commented Jun 19, 2023

Details on the issue fix or feature implementation

Closes #1072

This issue test demonstrates how the consumer can override resilience strategy that is defined in the library.

Confirm the following

  • I started this PR by branching from the head of the default branch
  • I have targeted the PR to merge into the default branch
  • I have included unit tests for the issue/feature
  • I have successfully run a local build

@martintmk martintmk added the v8 Issues related to the new version 8 of the Polly library. label Jun 19, 2023
@martintmk martintmk added this to the v8.0.0 milestone Jun 19, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1322 (ce2c171) into main (6fcf0f6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1322   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.42%   83.42%           
=======================================
  Files         268      268           
  Lines        6352     6352           
  Branches     1001     1001           
=======================================
  Hits         5299     5299           
  Misses        844      844           
  Partials      209      209           
Flag Coverage Δ
linux ?
macos 83.42% <ø> (ø)
windows 83.42% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@martintmk martintmk enabled auto-merge (squash) June 19, 2023 11:26
@martintmk martintmk merged commit 04bd9ec into main Jun 19, 2023
@martintmk martintmk deleted the mtomka/issues-tests branch June 19, 2023 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

v8 Issues related to the new version 8 of the Polly library.

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

How could I configure Polly in a lubrary that is in a class library instead of the main application?

3 participants