Skip to content

Conversation

@fuqing04
Copy link
Contributor

@fuqing04 fuqing04 commented Jan 7, 2026

Required items, please complete

Change(s):

  • See guidance below

Reason for Change(s):

  • See guidance below

Version Updated:

  • Required only for Detections/Analytic Rule templates
  • See guidance below

Testing Completed:

  • See guidance below

Checked that the validations are passing and have addressed any issues that are present:

  • See guidance below

Guidance <- remove section before submitting


Before submitting this PR please ensure that you have read the following sections and filled out the changes, reason for change and testing complete sections:

Thank you for your contribution to the Microsoft Sentinel Github repo.

Details of the code changes in your submitted PR. Providing descriptions for pull requests ensures there is context to changes being made and greatly enhances the code review process. Providing associated Issues that this resolves also easily connects the reason.

Change(s):

  • Changed table name to be "ThreatIntelIndicators" instead of "ThreatIntelligenceIndicator"

Reason for Change(s):

  • The actual table name is "ThreatIntelIndicators", use of a different name broke the connectivity check query. Upon research, "ThreatIntelligenceIndicator" was used over 3 years ago and seems deprecated.

Version updated:

  • No. The previous 3.1.9 version hasn't been published, hence squeeze this change into the same version.

The code should have been tested in a Microsoft Sentinel environment that does not have any custom parsers, functions or tables, so that you validate no incorrect syntax and execution functions properly. If your submission requires a custom parser or function, it must be submitted with the PR.

Testing Completed:

  • Yes

Note: If updating a detection, you must update the version field.

Before the submission has been made, please look at running the KQL and Yaml Validation Checks locally.
https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Sentinel#run-kql-validation-locally

Checked that the validations are passing and have addressed any issues that are present:

  • Yes

Note: Let us know if you have tried fixing the validation error and need help.

References:


@fuqing04 fuqing04 requested review from a team as code owners January 7, 2026 21:24
@fuqing04
Copy link
Contributor Author

fuqing04 commented Jan 7, 2026

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"

@fuqing04
Copy link
Contributor Author

fuqing04 commented Jan 7, 2026

@darshana Vedak (Tata Consultancy Services Limi)

@v-atulyadav v-atulyadav added the Solution Solution specialty review needed label Jan 8, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@jlheard jlheard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fuqing04 fuqing04 requested a review from jlheard January 8, 2026 17:15
jlheard
jlheard previously approved these changes Jan 8, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@jlheard jlheard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch!

@jlheard jlheard merged commit 60793e1 into Azure:master Jan 9, 2026
33 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Solution Solution specialty review needed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants