Skip to content

Conversation

@jiawang003
Copy link
Contributor

@jiawang003 jiawang003 commented Sep 5, 2017

request to add the new list and cancel database operations under 2017-03-01-preview, run autorest validation without issue

@msftclas
Copy link

msftclas commented Sep 5, 2017

@jiawang003,
Thanks for your contribution as a Microsoft full-time employee or intern. You do not need to sign a CLA.
Thanks,
Microsoft Pull Request Bot

@azuresdkciprbot
Copy link

Hi There,

I am the AutoRest Linter Azure bot. I am here to help. My task is to analyze the situation from the AutoRest linter perspective. Please review the below analysis result:

File: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md
Before the PR: Warning(s): 4 Error(s): 0
After the PR: Warning(s): 4 Error(s): 0

AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues

Send feedback and make AutoRest Linter Azure Bot smarter day by day!

Thanks for your co-operation.

@ravbhatnagar
Copy link
Contributor

Looks fine. Just one thing - Do you need an API to get a single operation - /operations/operationid as well?

@ravbhatnagar
Copy link
Contributor

@jiawang003 @jaredmoo FYI on above comment. Else looks good.

@jiawang003
Copy link
Contributor Author

customer need to find OperationId first. no need for now

@ravbhatnagar
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, just wanted to bring to your notice in case you missed. Looks good. ARM sign off.

@ravbhatnagar ravbhatnagar added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Sep 8, 2017
@dsgouda dsgouda merged commit b3f4823 into Azure:current Sep 12, 2017
@AutorestCI
Copy link

No modification for AutorestCI/azure-sdk-for-node

@AutorestCI
Copy link

@AutorestCI
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants