Skip to content

Conversation

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

  • specificed -> specified
  • sucessful -> successful
  • resturns -> returns
  • commited -> committed
  • Double word "maximum"
  • Double word "with"

…vicefabric

- specificed -> specified
- sucessful -> successful
- resturns -> returns
- commited -> committed
- Double word "maximum"
- Double word "with"
@openapi-portal-comment
Copy link

If you're a MSFT employee, click this link
to view this PR's validation status on our new OpenAPI Hub spec management tool.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 21, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 21, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3865

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 21, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-js#569

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 21, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#3387

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 21, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#2265

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Nov 21, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#4180

@sarangan12 sarangan12 merged commit 1cdd52a into Azure:master Nov 24, 2018
@nschonni nschonni deleted the typo-servicefabric/data-plane/Microsoft.ServiceFabric/servicefabric branch November 24, 2018 21:09
mccleanp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants