Skip to content

Conversation

@beoberha
Copy link
Contributor

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@beoberha beoberha requested a review from jaredmoo as a code owner July 25, 2019 17:21
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 25, 2019

In Testing, Please Ignore

[Logs] (Generated from b26f09a, Iteration 14)

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 25, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#6919

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 25, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

],
"properties": {}
},
"PrivateLink": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please check with Mario whether this should be PrivateLink vs PrivateLinkResource

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Discussed with Bo from NRP and he said we should use PrivateLinkResource. Fixed in most recent commit.

- Microsoft.Sql/preview/2018-06-01-preview/managedInstances.json
- Microsoft.Sql/preview/2018-06-01-preview/FailoverDatabases.json
- Microsoft.Sql/preview/2018-06-01-preview/FailoverElasticPools.json
- Microsoft.Sql/preview/2018-06-01-preview/PrivateEndpointConnections.json
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please also add to package-composite-v3

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed

}
},
"definitions": {
"PrivateLinkListResult": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PrivateLinkResourceListResult

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed from this PR. Will address when I create PLR PR

"properties": {
"privateLinkServiceConnectionState": {
"status": "Approved",
"description": "Approved by [email protected]"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You know company.com is real? I don't think they want us to use them as an example ;) Please use known examples such as contoso or example.com. "[email protected]" would be perfect.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed from this PR. Will address when I create PLR PR

@sergey-shandar sergey-shandar added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Aug 5, 2019
},
"privateLinkServiceConnectionState": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/PrivateLinkServiceConnectionStateProperty",
"description": "Connection State of the Private Endpoint Connection."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: capitalization is only for products (e.g. "Azure SQL Database"), not product features ("private endpoint connection"). Please find & replace.

@beoberha beoberha changed the title [DO NOT MERGE] Add PrivateEndpointConnection Swagger Add PrivateEndpointConnection Swagger Aug 27, 2019
@beoberha
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is ready for merging now

@beoberha
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sergey-shandar could you approve/merge pls

}
}
},
"PrivateEndpointProperty": {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you mark this as a resource id? See

as an example

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jaredmoo is this possible with our Framework?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Anthony, can you clarify which part of the example you are referring to? Is it x-ms-azure-resource: true?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup, sorry - my comment wasn't very clear. I'm just referring to x-ms-azure-resource: true

"type": "string"
},
"actionsRequired": {
"description": "The private link service connection description.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update description

@anthony-c-martin anthony-c-martin added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Aug 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants