Skip to content

Conversation

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

Sync eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools for PR Azure/azure-sdk-tools#11373 See eng/common workflow

@azure-sdk azure-sdk requested review from JoshLove-msft and Copilot and removed request for JoshLove-msft July 28, 2025 23:18
@azure-sdk azure-sdk requested a review from a team as a code owner July 28, 2025 23:18
@azure-sdk azure-sdk added EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system. Central-EngSys This issue is owned by the Engineering System team. labels Jul 28, 2025
@azure-sdk azure-sdk added EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system. Central-EngSys This issue is owned by the Engineering System team. labels Jul 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR synchronizes the eng/common directory with azure-sdk-tools for PR 11373, updating the TypeSpec emitter archetype pipeline template to use standard Git checkout operations instead of sparse checkout.

  • Replaces sparse-checkout template calls with direct checkout: self operations
  • Adds explicit PowerShell command to checkout the PR branch
  • Removes SessionRecords exclusion patterns from the checkout process

@azure-sdk azure-sdk force-pushed the sync-eng/common-full-checkout-11373 branch 3 times, most recently from ed4c811 to f03d646 Compare July 29, 2025 15:30
@azure-sdk azure-sdk force-pushed the sync-eng/common-full-checkout-11373 branch from f03d646 to d99237f Compare July 29, 2025 16:27
@azure-sdk azure-sdk merged commit e077082 into main Jul 29, 2025
16 checks passed
@azure-sdk azure-sdk deleted the sync-eng/common-full-checkout-11373 branch July 29, 2025 20:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Central-EngSys This issue is owned by the Engineering System team. EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants