Skip to content

Conversation

@praveenkuttappan
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@praveenkuttappan praveenkuttappan added APIView Issues related to APIView core functionality or UI Central-EngSys This issue is owned by the Engineering System team. labels Oct 29, 2024
@praveenkuttappan praveenkuttappan self-assigned this Oct 29, 2024
Copy link
Member

@chidozieononiwu chidozieononiwu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left suggestion to fix typo

@praveenkuttappan praveenkuttappan merged commit 4429cef into Azure:main Oct 30, 2024
3 checks passed
@praveenkuttappan praveenkuttappan deleted the token_utility_doc branch October 30, 2024 17:00

APIViewJsonUtility is published to Azure DevOps artifact. You can install this .NET tool from [azure-sdk-for-net feed](https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/public/_artifacts/feed/azure-sdk-for-net/NuGet/APIViewJsonTool/overview) using below command.

`dotnet tool install --add-source "https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/public/_packaging/azure-sdk-for-net/nuget/v3/index.json" --version 1.0.0-dev.20240919.3 --tool-path <installation path> APIViewJsonTool
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would it be better to just say <version> instead of us hardcoding a version here? I wonder if someone is not paying attention, they will just copy the command and might not get the latest version


### Usage

Here are two examplea of how to use APIViewJsonUtility:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

examples

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

APIView Issues related to APIView core functionality or UI Central-EngSys This issue is owned by the Engineering System team.

Projects

Status: ✅ Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants