Skip to content

Claitos/Track-Parameter-Resolutions

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

60 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Track Parameter Resolutions

Analytical estimation of tracking performance in cylindrical-shaped silicon detectors using covariance propagation and multiple-scattering models.

This project provides a lightweight framework for studying how detector geometry, sensor resolution, material budget, magnetic field strength, and track properties affect:

  • Track position resolution
  • Momentum resolution
  • Extrapolation uncertainty
  • Multiple scattering contributions

The repository was originally developed to gain an intuitive understanding of track reconstruction performance and to reproduce the main effects that drive detector design decisions.


Physical Model

The framework models a charged particle traversing a layered silicon detector inside a magnetic field.

For each detector layer, the following quantities are specified:

  • Radial position
  • Material thickness
  • Transverse hit resolution
  • Longitudinal hit resolution

From this the following features can be calculated:

Position Resolution Studies

Calculate transverse track position uncertainty

detector.transverse_track_position_uncertainty(
    momentum=1.0,
    mass=0.139,
    number_of_hits=7,
    extrapolation_radius=0.01,
    polar_angle=90
)

Includes:

  • Detector resolution effects
  • Multiple scattering in detector layers
  • Multiple scattering in air between layers
  • Extrapolation uncertainty

Longitudinal Resolution Studies

Calculate uncertainty along the beam direction

detector.longitudinal_track_position_uncertainty(
    momentum=1.0,
    mass=0.139,
    number_of_hits=7,
    extrapolation_radius=0.01,
    polar_angle=90
)

Momentum Resolution

Estimate relative transverse momentum resolution

detector.transverse_momentum_reso(
    momentum=1.0,
    mass=0.139,
    number_of_hits=7,
    polar_angle=90
)

The momentum resolution is extracted from the curvature parameter covariance obtained from the parabolic fit.


Example Detector Setup

detector = DetectorSetup(
    average_layer_radii,
    layer_thickness,
    detector_resolutions_rphi,
    detector_resolutions_z,
    radiation_length_medium,
    magnetic_field_strength
)

where:

Parameter Description
average_layer_radii Detector layer radii [m]
layer_thickness Material thickness in units of radiation length
detector_resolutions_rphi Transverse hit resolution [m]
detector_resolutions_z Longitudinal hit resolution [m]
radiation_length_medium Radiation length of medium between layers [m]
magnetic_field_strength Magnetic field strength [T]

Notebook Walkthrough

The accompanying notebook demonstrates the use of the Python code. The notebook is intended to be educational and can be read sequentially together with a paper or other literature on analytical tracking-performance estimation.


Limitations

This framework intentionally uses simplified models.

Not included:

  • Full helix fitting
  • Energy loss
  • Non-uniform magnetic fields
  • Detector inefficiencies
  • Pattern recognition effects
  • Non-Gaussian scattering tails

The objective is analytical understanding rather than full detector simulation.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors