Skip to content

Conversation

@andrewlecuyer
Copy link
Collaborator

Updated the namespace being utilized to lookup the pgo-backrest-repo-config secret when enabling AWS S3 support for a cluster (specifically when creating the pgBackRest shared repo deployment). The Operator namespace is now utilized when looking up this secret (instead of the namespace for the cluster itself), in support of Ansible PGO installs where the pgo-backrest-repo-config secret is created in the Operator namespace only.

Checklist:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like them to be included?
  • Have you updated or added documentation for the change, as applicable?
  • Have you tested your changes on all related environments with successful results, as applicable?

Type of Changes:

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

What is the current behavior? (link to any open issues here)
The wrong namespace (specifically the namespace of the cluster) is being utilized to lookup the pgo-backrest-repo-config secret when enabling AWS S3 support for a cluster (specifically when creating the pgBackRest shared repo deployment).

[ch4085]

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
The Operator namespace is now utilized when looking up this secret (instead of the namespace for the cluster itself), in support of Ansible PGO installs where the pgo-backrest-repo-config secret is created in the Operator namespace only.

Other information:
N/A

'pgo-backrest-repo-config' when enabling S3 support
@jmccormick2001 jmccormick2001 merged commit 1b24f74 into CrunchyData:develop May 30, 2019
@andrewlecuyer andrewlecuyer deleted the fix-backrest-repo-config-secret-ns branch September 9, 2019 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants