Skip to content

Conversation

@Maffooch
Copy link
Contributor

@Maffooch Maffooch commented Apr 1, 2024

It was discovered that qualys does not have a Critical severity per their severity knowledgeable article. To accommodate the correct mapping with as little impact to hash codes without changing severities of existing findings, we can offer an opt in setting adopt the new behavior outlined In the knowledge base article linked above

[sc-5119]

@github-actions github-actions bot added settings_changes Needs changes to settings.py based on changes in settings.dist.py included in this PR parser labels Apr 1, 2024
@dryrunsecurity
Copy link

dryrunsecurity bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.

DryRun Security Status Findings
Authn/Authz Analyzer 0 findings
Configured Codepaths Analyzer 0 findings
Sensitive Files Analyzer 0 findings

Note

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

Tip

Get answers to your security questions. Add a comment in this PR starting with @DryRunSecurity. For example...

@dryrunsecurity What are common security issues with web application cookies?

Powered by DryRun Security

Copy link
Contributor

@mtesauro mtesauro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@Maffooch Maffooch merged commit 10ca004 into DefectDojo:dev Apr 2, 2024
@Maffooch Maffooch deleted the qualys-legacy branch May 8, 2024 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

parser settings_changes Needs changes to settings.py based on changes in settings.dist.py included in this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants