[SPARK-20861][ML][PYTHON] Delegate looping over paramMaps to estimators #56
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Changes: pyspark.ml Estimators can take either a list of param maps or a dict of params. This change allows the CrossValidator and TrainValidationSplit Estimators to pass through lists of param maps to the underlying estimators so that those estimators can handle parallelization when appropriate (eg distributed hyper parameter tuning). Testing: Existing unit tests. Author: Bago Amirbekian <[email protected]> Closes #18077 from MrBago/delegate_params.
GulajavaMinistudio
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Currently, Spark DS V2 aggregate push-down doesn't supports project with alias. Refer https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/c91c2e9afec0d5d5bbbd2e155057fe409c5bb928/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/V2ScanRelationPushDown.scala#L96 This PR let it works good with alias. **The first example:** the origin plan show below: ``` Aggregate [DEPT#0], [DEPT#0, sum(mySalary#8) AS total#14] +- Project [DEPT#0, SALARY#2 AS mySalary#8] +- ScanBuilderHolder [DEPT#0, NAME#1, SALARY#2, BONUS#3], RelationV2[DEPT#0, NAME#1, SALARY#2, BONUS#3] test.employee, JDBCScanBuilder(org.apache.spark.sql.test.TestSparkSession77978658,StructType(StructField(DEPT,IntegerType,true),StructField(NAME,StringType,true),StructField(SALARY,DecimalType(20,2),true),StructField(BONUS,DoubleType,true)),org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JDBCOptions5f8da82) ``` If we can complete push down the aggregate, then the plan will be: ``` Project [DEPT#0, SUM(SALARY)#18 AS sum(SALARY#2)#13 AS total#14] +- RelationV2[DEPT#0, SUM(SALARY)#18] test.employee ``` If we can partial push down the aggregate, then the plan will be: ``` Aggregate [DEPT#0], [DEPT#0, sum(cast(SUM(SALARY)#18 as decimal(20,2))) AS total#14] +- RelationV2[DEPT#0, SUM(SALARY)#18] test.employee ``` **The second example:** the origin plan show below: ``` Aggregate [myDept#33], [myDept#33, sum(mySalary#34) AS total#40] +- Project [DEPT#25 AS myDept#33, SALARY#27 AS mySalary#34] +- ScanBuilderHolder [DEPT#25, NAME#26, SALARY#27, BONUS#28], RelationV2[DEPT#25, NAME#26, SALARY#27, BONUS#28] test.employee, JDBCScanBuilder(org.apache.spark.sql.test.TestSparkSession25c4f621,StructType(StructField(DEPT,IntegerType,true),StructField(NAME,StringType,true),StructField(SALARY,DecimalType(20,2),true),StructField(BONUS,DoubleType,true)),org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JDBCOptions345d641e) ``` If we can complete push down the aggregate, then the plan will be: ``` Project [DEPT#25 AS myDept#33, SUM(SALARY)#44 AS sum(SALARY#27)#39 AS total#40] +- RelationV2[DEPT#25, SUM(SALARY)#44] test.employee ``` If we can partial push down the aggregate, then the plan will be: ``` Aggregate [myDept#33], [DEPT#25 AS myDept#33, sum(cast(SUM(SALARY)#56 as decimal(20,2))) AS total#52] +- RelationV2[DEPT#25, SUM(SALARY)#56] test.employee ``` ### Why are the changes needed? Alias is more useful. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? 'Yes'. Users could see DS V2 aggregate push-down supports project with alias. ### How was this patch tested? New tests. Closes apache#35932 from beliefer/SPARK-38533_new. Authored-by: Jiaan Geng <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
GulajavaMinistudio
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
…ead pool ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to use a meaningful class name prefix for REST Submission API thread pool instead of the default value of Jetty QueuedThreadPool, `"qtp"+super.hashCode()`. https://github.com/dekellum/jetty/blob/3dc0120d573816de7d6a83e2d6a97035288bdd4a/jetty-util/src/main/java/org/eclipse/jetty/util/thread/QueuedThreadPool.java#L64 ### Why are the changes needed? This is helpful during JVM investigation. **BEFORE (4.0.0-preview2)** ``` $ SPARK_MASTER_OPTS='-Dspark.master.rest.enabled=true' sbin/start-master.sh $ jstack 28217 | grep qtp "qtp1925630411-52" #52 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.07ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134906c10 nid=0xde03 runnable [0x0000000314592000] "qtp1925630411-53" #53 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.05ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134ac6810 nid=0xc603 runnable [0x000000031479e000] "qtp1925630411-54" #54 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.06ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x000000013491ae10 nid=0xdc03 runnable [0x00000003149aa000] "qtp1925630411-55" #55 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.08ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134ac9810 nid=0xc803 runnable [0x0000000314bb6000] "qtp1925630411-56" #56 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.04ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134ac9e10 nid=0xda03 runnable [0x0000000314dc2000] "qtp1925630411-57" #57 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.05ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134aca410 nid=0xca03 runnable [0x0000000314fce000] "qtp1925630411-58" #58 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.04ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134acaa10 nid=0xcb03 runnable [0x00000003151da000] "qtp1925630411-59" #59 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.06ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134acb010 nid=0xcc03 runnable [0x00000003153e6000] "qtp1925630411-60-acceptor-0108e9815-ServerConnector1e497474{HTTP/1.1, (http/1.1)}{M3-Max.local:6066}" #60 daemon prio=3 os_prio=31 cpu=0.11ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x00000001317ffa10 nid=0xcd03 runnable [0x00000003155f2000] "qtp1925630411-61-acceptor-11d90f2aa-ServerConnector1e497474{HTTP/1.1, (http/1.1)}{M3-Max.local:6066}" #61 daemon prio=3 os_prio=31 cpu=0.10ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x00000001314ed610 nid=0xcf03 waiting on condition [0x00000003157fe000] ``` **AFTER** ``` $ SPARK_MASTER_OPTS='-Dspark.master.rest.enabled=true' sbin/start-master.sh $ jstack 28317 | grep StandaloneRestServer "StandaloneRestServer-52" #52 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.09ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284a8e10 nid=0xdb03 runnable [0x000000032cfce000] "StandaloneRestServer-53" #53 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.06ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284acc10 nid=0xda03 runnable [0x000000032d1da000] "StandaloneRestServer-54" #54 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.05ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284ae610 nid=0xd803 runnable [0x000000032d3e6000] "StandaloneRestServer-55" #55 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.09ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284aec10 nid=0xd703 runnable [0x000000032d5f2000] "StandaloneRestServer-56" #56 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.06ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284af210 nid=0xc803 runnable [0x000000032d7fe000] "StandaloneRestServer-57" #57 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.05ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284af810 nid=0xc903 runnable [0x000000032da0a000] "StandaloneRestServer-58" #58 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.06ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284afe10 nid=0xcb03 runnable [0x000000032dc16000] "StandaloneRestServer-59" #59 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.05ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284b0410 nid=0xcc03 runnable [0x000000032de22000] "StandaloneRestServer-60-acceptor-04aefbaa8-ServerConnector44284d85{HTTP/1.1, (http/1.1)}{M3-Max.local:6066}" #60 daemon prio=3 os_prio=31 cpu=0.13ms elapsed=60.05s tid=0x000000015cda1a10 nid=0xcd03 runnable [0x000000032e02e000] "StandaloneRestServer-61-acceptor-148976251-ServerConnector44284d85{HTTP/1.1, (http/1.1)}{M3-Max.local:6066}" #61 daemon prio=3 os_prio=31 cpu=0.12ms elapsed=60.05s tid=0x000000015cd1c810 nid=0xce03 waiting on condition [0x000000032e23a000] ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, the thread names are accessed during the debugging. ### How was this patch tested? Manual review. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#48924 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-50385. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: panbingkun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes:
pyspark.ml Estimators can take either a list of param maps or a dict of params. This change allows the CrossValidator and TrainValidationSplit Estimators to pass through lists of param maps to the underlying estimators so that those estimators can handle parallelization when appropriate (eg distributed hyper parameter tuning).
Testing:
Existing unit tests.
Author: Bago Amirbekian [email protected]
Closes apache#18077 from MrBago/delegate_params.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.