[LTSR] avoid OperandBindInfo label conflict

[qpdpQ]

for ticket: https://github.ibm.com/IBMPrivateCloud/roadmap/issues/58807
An easier way to all multiple operandBindInfos mounting same secret
When two operandBindInfos are watching same secret/configmap, they are adding the same label to the secret/configmap operator.ibm.com/watched-by-opbi-with-name: ibm-licensing-bindinfo
This pr will try to fix it by adding a number after the label key

test:

1. install cs-operator and odlm
2. create two operandBindInfos for Licensing configmaps and secrets

expect result:

1. operandBindInfo will not fail
2. configmaps and secrets will be copied to another namespace
3. there will be a new label in the secret <namespace>.<name>/bindinfo: true

This image can be used to verify quay.io/yuchen_li1/odlm-amd64@sha256:ba111b9726675779bbdaafd6bfcbf583d6049d609686b70b3e4b43c0c285fcaa

test looks good to me:

labels:
    ibm-common-services.ibm-iam-test-bindinfo/bindinfo: 'true'
    ibm-common-services.ibm-iam-bindinfo/bindinfo: 'true'
    operator.ibm.com/managedBy-opbi: original

[ibm-ci-bot]

@qpdpQ: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
kind-e2e-test-operand-deployment-lifecycle-manager-amd64	bf70411	link	true	/test e2e-test-kind-operand-deployment-lifecycle-manager-amd64

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[Daniel-Fan]

Thank you @qpdpQ !
It looks good to me!

I believe that this would be a good enhancement for Bedrock v4.1 as well.
Would you mind opening an enterprise Github issue to track this enhancement for Bedrock v4.1?

Also could you help to open an issue to track the E2E Test update on kind cluster for LTSR branch as well?
We could follow this PR to update the test case. #927
We could try git cherry-pick to pick up the test case changes. But some of the details would be different since there are some new enhancement in ODLM v4.0.

[Daniel-Fan]

/lgtm

[ibm-ci-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Daniel-Fan, qpdpQ

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Daniel-Fan,qpdpQ]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment