Skip to content

Conversation

@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

@vtjnash vtjnash commented Mar 10, 2023

It does not really make sense to scan the tree twice, when we already will extra this info near completely from the intersection search. The cost was small, but non-negligible.

It does not really make sense to scan the tree twice, when we already
will extra this info near completely from the intersection search.
The cost was small, but non-negligible.
@vtjnash vtjnash added the backport 1.9 Change should be backported to release-1.9 label Mar 10, 2023
@vtjnash vtjnash merged commit 38d9d83 into master Mar 16, 2023
@vtjnash vtjnash deleted the jn/method-nooverwrite branch March 16, 2023 16:36
oscardssmith pushed a commit to oscardssmith/julia that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2023
…ng#48968)

It does not really make sense to scan the tree twice, when we already
will extra this info near completely from the intersection search.
The cost was small, but non-negligible.
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2023
It does not really make sense to scan the tree twice, when we already
will extra this info near completely from the intersection search.
The cost was small, but non-negligible.

(cherry picked from commit 38d9d83)
@KristofferC KristofferC mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2023
52 tasks
@KristofferC KristofferC removed the backport 1.9 Change should be backported to release-1.9 label Mar 31, 2023
Xnartharax pushed a commit to Xnartharax/julia that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2023
…ng#48968)

It does not really make sense to scan the tree twice, when we already
will extra this info near completely from the intersection search.
The cost was small, but non-negligible.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants