forked from apache/spark
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Try Dongjoon's proposal #26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MaxGekk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2021
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR is to add code-gen support for LEFT OUTER / RIGHT OUTER sort merge join. Currently sort merge join only supports inner join type (https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala#L374 ). There's no fundamental reason why we cannot support code-gen for other join types. Here we add code-gen for LEFT OUTER / RIGHT OUTER join. Will submit followup PRs to add LEFT SEMI, LEFT ANTI and FULL OUTER code-gen separately. The change is to extend current sort merge join logic to work with LEFT OUTER and RIGHT OUTER (should work with LEFT SEMI/ANTI as well, but FULL OUTER join needs some other more code change). Replace left/right with streamed/buffered to make code extendable to other join types besides inner join. Example query: ``` val df1 = spark.range(10).select($"id".as("k1"), $"id".as("k3")) val df2 = spark.range(4).select($"id".as("k2"), $"id".as("k4")) df1.join(df2.hint("SHUFFLE_MERGE"), $"k1" === $"k2" && $"k3" + 1 < $"k4", "left_outer").explain("codegen") ``` Example generated code: ``` == Subtree 5 / 5 (maxMethodCodeSize:396; maxConstantPoolSize:159(0.24% used); numInnerClasses:0) == *(5) SortMergeJoin [k1#2L], [k2#8L], LeftOuter, ((k3#3L + 1) < k4#9L) :- *(2) Sort [k1#2L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0 : +- Exchange hashpartitioning(k1#2L, 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#26] : +- *(1) Project [id#0L AS k1#2L, id#0L AS k3#3L] : +- *(1) Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=2) +- *(4) Sort [k2#8L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0 +- Exchange hashpartitioning(k2#8L, 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=apache#32] +- *(3) Project [id#6L AS k2#8L, id#6L AS k4#9L] +- *(3) Range (0, 4, step=1, splits=2) Generated code: /* 001 */ public Object generate(Object[] references) { /* 002 */ return new GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage5(references); /* 003 */ } /* 004 */ /* 005 */ // codegenStageId=5 /* 006 */ final class GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage5 extends org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator { /* 007 */ private Object[] references; /* 008 */ private scala.collection.Iterator[] inputs; /* 009 */ private scala.collection.Iterator smj_streamedInput_0; /* 010 */ private scala.collection.Iterator smj_bufferedInput_0; /* 011 */ private InternalRow smj_streamedRow_0; /* 012 */ private InternalRow smj_bufferedRow_0; /* 013 */ private long smj_value_2; /* 014 */ private org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray smj_matches_0; /* 015 */ private long smj_value_3; /* 016 */ private org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.UnsafeRowWriter[] smj_mutableStateArray_0 = new org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.UnsafeRowWriter[1]; /* 017 */ /* 018 */ public GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage5(Object[] references) { /* 019 */ this.references = references; /* 020 */ } /* 021 */ /* 022 */ public void init(int index, scala.collection.Iterator[] inputs) { /* 023 */ partitionIndex = index; /* 024 */ this.inputs = inputs; /* 025 */ smj_streamedInput_0 = inputs[0]; /* 026 */ smj_bufferedInput_0 = inputs[1]; /* 027 */ /* 028 */ smj_matches_0 = new org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray(2147483632, 2147483647); /* 029 */ smj_mutableStateArray_0[0] = new org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.UnsafeRowWriter(4, 0); /* 030 */ /* 031 */ } /* 032 */ /* 033 */ private boolean findNextJoinRows( /* 034 */ scala.collection.Iterator streamedIter, /* 035 */ scala.collection.Iterator bufferedIter) { /* 036 */ smj_streamedRow_0 = null; /* 037 */ int comp = 0; /* 038 */ while (smj_streamedRow_0 == null) { /* 039 */ if (!streamedIter.hasNext()) return false; /* 040 */ smj_streamedRow_0 = (InternalRow) streamedIter.next(); /* 041 */ long smj_value_0 = smj_streamedRow_0.getLong(0); /* 042 */ if (false) { /* 043 */ if (!smj_matches_0.isEmpty()) { /* 044 */ smj_matches_0.clear(); /* 045 */ } /* 046 */ return false; /* 047 */ /* 048 */ } /* 049 */ if (!smj_matches_0.isEmpty()) { /* 050 */ comp = 0; /* 051 */ if (comp == 0) { /* 052 */ comp = (smj_value_0 > smj_value_3 ? 1 : smj_value_0 < smj_value_3 ? -1 : 0); /* 053 */ } /* 054 */ /* 055 */ if (comp == 0) { /* 056 */ return true; /* 057 */ } /* 058 */ smj_matches_0.clear(); /* 059 */ } /* 060 */ /* 061 */ do { /* 062 */ if (smj_bufferedRow_0 == null) { /* 063 */ if (!bufferedIter.hasNext()) { /* 064 */ smj_value_3 = smj_value_0; /* 065 */ return !smj_matches_0.isEmpty(); /* 066 */ } /* 067 */ smj_bufferedRow_0 = (InternalRow) bufferedIter.next(); /* 068 */ long smj_value_1 = smj_bufferedRow_0.getLong(0); /* 069 */ if (false) { /* 070 */ smj_bufferedRow_0 = null; /* 071 */ continue; /* 072 */ } /* 073 */ smj_value_2 = smj_value_1; /* 074 */ } /* 075 */ /* 076 */ comp = 0; /* 077 */ if (comp == 0) { /* 078 */ comp = (smj_value_0 > smj_value_2 ? 1 : smj_value_0 < smj_value_2 ? -1 : 0); /* 079 */ } /* 080 */ /* 081 */ if (comp > 0) { /* 082 */ smj_bufferedRow_0 = null; /* 083 */ } else if (comp < 0) { /* 084 */ if (!smj_matches_0.isEmpty()) { /* 085 */ smj_value_3 = smj_value_0; /* 086 */ return true; /* 087 */ } else { /* 088 */ return false; /* 089 */ } /* 090 */ } else { /* 091 */ smj_matches_0.add((UnsafeRow) smj_bufferedRow_0); /* 092 */ smj_bufferedRow_0 = null; /* 093 */ } /* 094 */ } while (smj_streamedRow_0 != null); /* 095 */ } /* 096 */ return false; // unreachable /* 097 */ } /* 098 */ /* 099 */ protected void processNext() throws java.io.IOException { /* 100 */ while (smj_streamedInput_0.hasNext()) { /* 101 */ findNextJoinRows(smj_streamedInput_0, smj_bufferedInput_0); /* 102 */ long smj_value_4 = -1L; /* 103 */ long smj_value_5 = -1L; /* 104 */ boolean smj_loaded_0 = false; /* 105 */ smj_value_5 = smj_streamedRow_0.getLong(1); /* 106 */ scala.collection.Iterator<UnsafeRow> smj_iterator_0 = smj_matches_0.generateIterator(); /* 107 */ boolean smj_foundMatch_0 = false; /* 108 */ /* 109 */ // the last iteration of this loop is to emit an empty row if there is no matched rows. /* 110 */ while (smj_iterator_0.hasNext() || !smj_foundMatch_0) { /* 111 */ InternalRow smj_bufferedRow_1 = smj_iterator_0.hasNext() ? /* 112 */ (InternalRow) smj_iterator_0.next() : null; /* 113 */ boolean smj_isNull_5 = true; /* 114 */ long smj_value_9 = -1L; /* 115 */ if (smj_bufferedRow_1 != null) { /* 116 */ long smj_value_8 = smj_bufferedRow_1.getLong(1); /* 117 */ smj_isNull_5 = false; /* 118 */ smj_value_9 = smj_value_8; /* 119 */ } /* 120 */ if (smj_bufferedRow_1 != null) { /* 121 */ boolean smj_isNull_6 = true; /* 122 */ boolean smj_value_10 = false; /* 123 */ long smj_value_11 = -1L; /* 124 */ /* 125 */ smj_value_11 = smj_value_5 + 1L; /* 126 */ /* 127 */ if (!smj_isNull_5) { /* 128 */ smj_isNull_6 = false; // resultCode could change nullability. /* 129 */ smj_value_10 = smj_value_11 < smj_value_9; /* 130 */ /* 131 */ } /* 132 */ if (smj_isNull_6 || !smj_value_10) { /* 133 */ continue; /* 134 */ } /* 135 */ } /* 136 */ if (!smj_loaded_0) { /* 137 */ smj_loaded_0 = true; /* 138 */ smj_value_4 = smj_streamedRow_0.getLong(0); /* 139 */ } /* 140 */ boolean smj_isNull_3 = true; /* 141 */ long smj_value_7 = -1L; /* 142 */ if (smj_bufferedRow_1 != null) { /* 143 */ long smj_value_6 = smj_bufferedRow_1.getLong(0); /* 144 */ smj_isNull_3 = false; /* 145 */ smj_value_7 = smj_value_6; /* 146 */ } /* 147 */ smj_foundMatch_0 = true; /* 148 */ ((org.apache.spark.sql.execution.metric.SQLMetric) references[0] /* numOutputRows */).add(1); /* 149 */ /* 150 */ smj_mutableStateArray_0[0].reset(); /* 151 */ /* 152 */ smj_mutableStateArray_0[0].zeroOutNullBytes(); /* 153 */ /* 154 */ smj_mutableStateArray_0[0].write(0, smj_value_4); /* 155 */ /* 156 */ smj_mutableStateArray_0[0].write(1, smj_value_5); /* 157 */ /* 158 */ if (smj_isNull_3) { /* 159 */ smj_mutableStateArray_0[0].setNullAt(2); /* 160 */ } else { /* 161 */ smj_mutableStateArray_0[0].write(2, smj_value_7); /* 162 */ } /* 163 */ /* 164 */ if (smj_isNull_5) { /* 165 */ smj_mutableStateArray_0[0].setNullAt(3); /* 166 */ } else { /* 167 */ smj_mutableStateArray_0[0].write(3, smj_value_9); /* 168 */ } /* 169 */ append((smj_mutableStateArray_0[0].getRow()).copy()); /* 170 */ /* 171 */ } /* 172 */ if (shouldStop()) return; /* 173 */ } /* 174 */ ((org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.SortMergeJoinExec) references[1] /* plan */).cleanupResources(); /* 175 */ } /* 176 */ /* 177 */ } ``` ### Why are the changes needed? Improve query CPU performance. Example micro benchmark below showed 10% run-time improvement. ``` def sortMergeJoinWithDuplicates(): Unit = { val N = 2 << 20 codegenBenchmark("sort merge join with duplicates", N) { val df1 = spark.range(N) .selectExpr(s"(id * 15485863) % ${N*10} as k1", "id as k3") val df2 = spark.range(N) .selectExpr(s"(id * 15485867) % ${N*10} as k2", "id as k4") val df = df1.join(df2, col("k1") === col("k2") && col("k3") * 3 < col("k4"), "left_outer") assert(df.queryExecution.sparkPlan.find(_.isInstanceOf[SortMergeJoinExec]).isDefined) df.noop() } } ``` ``` Running benchmark: sort merge join with duplicates Running case: sort merge join with duplicates outer-smj-codegen off Stopped after 2 iterations, 2696 ms Running case: sort merge join with duplicates outer-smj-codegen on Stopped after 5 iterations, 6058 ms Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_181-b13 on Mac OS X 10.16 Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz sort merge join with duplicates: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- sort merge join with duplicates outer-smj-codegen off 1333 1348 21 1.6 635.7 1.0X sort merge join with duplicates outer-smj-codegen on 1169 1212 47 1.8 557.4 1.1X ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Added unit test in `WholeStageCodegenSuite.scala` and `WholeStageCodegenSuite.scala`. Closes apache#32476 from c21/smj-outer-codegen. Authored-by: Cheng Su <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
MaxGekk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2022
…n Aggregate ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR implements the implicit lateral column alias on `Aggregate` case. For example, ```sql -- LCA in Aggregate. The avg_salary references an attribute defined by a previous alias SELECT dept, average(salary) AS avg_salary, avg_salary + average(bonus) FROM employee GROUP BY dept ``` The high level implementation idea is to insert the `Project` node above, and falling back to the resolution of lateral alias of Project code path in the last PR. * Phase 1: recognize resolved lateral alias, wrap the attributes referencing them with `LateralColumnAliasReference` * Phase 2: when the `Aggregate` operator is resolved, it goes through the whole aggregation list, extracts the aggregation expressions and grouping expressions to keep them in this `Aggregate` node, and add a `Project` above with the original output. It doesn't do anything on `LateralColumnAliasReference`, but completely leave it to the Project in the future turns of this rule. Example: ``` // Before rewrite: Aggregate [dept#14] [dept#14 AS a#12, 'a + 1, avg(salary#16) AS b#13, 'b + avg(bonus#17)] +- Child [dept#14,name#15,salary#16,bonus#17] // After phase 1: Aggregate [dept#14] [dept#14 AS a#12, lca(a) + 1, avg(salary#16) AS b#13, lca(b) + avg(bonus#17)] +- Child [dept#14,name#15,salary#16,bonus#17] // After phase 2: Project [dept#14 AS a#12, lca(a) + 1, avg(salary)#26 AS b#13, lca(b) + avg(bonus)#27] +- Aggregate [dept#14] [avg(salary#16) AS avg(salary)#26, avg(bonus#17) AS avg(bonus)#27, dept#14] +- Child [dept#14,name#15,salary#16,bonus#17] // Now the problem falls back to the lateral alias resolution in Project. // After future rounds of this rule: Project [a#12, a#12 + 1, b#13, b#13 + avg(bonus)#27] +- Project [dept#14 AS a#12, avg(salary)#26 AS b#13] +- Aggregate [dept#14] [avg(salary#16) AS avg(salary)#26, avg(bonus#17) AS avg(bonus)#27, dept#14] +- Child [dept#14,name#15,salary#16,bonus#17] ``` Similar as the last PR (apache#38776), because lateral column alias has higher resolution priority than outer reference, it will try to resolve an `OuterReference` using lateral column alias, similar as an `UnresolvedAttribute`. If success, it strips `OuterReference` and also wraps it with `LateralColumnAliasReference`. ### Why are the changes needed? Similar as stated in apache#38776. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, as shown in the above example, it will be able to resolve lateral column alias in Aggregate. ### How was this patch tested? Existing tests and newly added tests. Closes apache#39040 from anchovYu/SPARK-27561-agg. Authored-by: Xinyi Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Why are the changes needed?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?