Skip to content

Conversation

@snakefoot
Copy link
Contributor

@snakefoot snakefoot commented Sep 1, 2020

Trying to resolve #4105. Bug was introduced with #1993

@snakefoot snakefoot added bug Bug report / Bug fix file-target file-archiving Issues with archiving with the file target labels Sep 1, 2020
@snakefoot snakefoot added this to the 4.7.5 milestone Sep 1, 2020
@snakefoot snakefoot force-pushed the FileTargetNewFileWriteHeader branch 2 times, most recently from 7154169 to 23805b8 Compare September 2, 2020 05:36
Copy link
Member

@304NotModified 304NotModified left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@snakefoot snakefoot force-pushed the FileTargetNewFileWriteHeader branch from 23805b8 to 1f6ca51 Compare September 2, 2020 19:09
@snakefoot snakefoot force-pushed the FileTargetNewFileWriteHeader branch from 1f6ca51 to 6db449b Compare September 2, 2020 19:10
@snakefoot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Force-commit to remove code-smell, and improve InternalLogger.Debug-message.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 2, 2020

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities (and Security Hotspot 0 Security Hotspots to review)
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

86.7% 86.7% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@304NotModified 304NotModified merged commit 56ff6f4 into NLog:master Sep 2, 2020
@304NotModified
Copy link
Member

@snakefoot please no force push next time. I cannot check what have been changed as the review state has been reset.

Ps: Nowadays I squash merge all pull requests if no explicit merge is needed after squash

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Bug report / Bug fix file-archiving Issues with archiving with the file target file-target size/M

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants