Skip to content

Conversation

sydseter
Copy link
Collaborator

@sydseter sydseter commented Aug 5, 2025

5 has been used for the previous list above.

Copy link
Contributor

@jgadsden jgadsden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a good change, thanks @sydseter
As we have the hood up, could we also consider rewording this line 52:

9. Avoid the use of known vulnerable functions (e.g., printf, strcat, strcpy etc.)

to be less C language specific? such as rewording as "9. Avoid the use of known vulnerable functions"

Unless it is only C that has known vulnerable functions, which may be the case

@sydseter sydseter merged commit 0cde6ca into main Aug 5, 2025
@sydseter sydseter mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants