-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.3k
[go][java] Document new parameterized server support #5380
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
83eeeea
89af9cf
bf12323
1b45e49
a6f98bc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ | |
| import org.openapitools.codegen.languages.features.GzipFeatures; | ||
| import org.openapitools.codegen.languages.features.PerformBeanValidationFeatures; | ||
| import org.openapitools.codegen.meta.features.DocumentationFeature; | ||
| import org.openapitools.codegen.meta.features.GlobalFeature; | ||
| import org.openapitools.codegen.templating.mustache.CaseFormatLambda; | ||
| import org.openapitools.codegen.utils.ProcessUtils; | ||
| import org.slf4j.Logger; | ||
|
|
@@ -106,8 +107,10 @@ public class JavaClientCodegen extends AbstractJavaCodegen | |
| public JavaClientCodegen() { | ||
| super(); | ||
|
|
||
| // TODO: Move GlobalFeature.ParameterizedServer to library: jersey after moving featureSet to generatorMetadata | ||
| featureSet = getFeatureSet().modify() | ||
| .includeDocumentationFeatures(DocumentationFeature.Readme) | ||
| .includeGlobalFeatures(GlobalFeature.ParameterizedServer) | ||
| .build(); | ||
|
|
||
| outputFolder = "generated-code" + File.separator + "java"; | ||
|
|
@@ -290,6 +293,7 @@ public void processOpts() { | |
| supportingFiles.add(new SupportingFile("ApiClient.mustache", invokerFolder, "ApiClient.java")); | ||
| supportingFiles.add(new SupportingFile("ServerConfiguration.mustache", invokerFolder, "ServerConfiguration.java")); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this should stay here
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. see https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/blob/master/modules/openapi-generator/src/main/resources/Java/ApiClient.mustache#L68-L94 and https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/blob/master/modules/openapi-generator/src/main/resources/Java/ApiClient.mustache#L684-L695
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I see. I could have sworn it was for all clients when I reviewed your other PR and didn't see how it was jersey2-only. I regenerated samples against this commit and pushed to check compilation, but I'll make this change and push over that. |
||
| supportingFiles.add(new SupportingFile("ServerVariable.mustache", invokerFolder, "ServerVariable.java")); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!(RESTTEMPLATE.equals(getLibrary()) || REST_ASSURED.equals(getLibrary()) || NATIVE.equals(getLibrary()) || MICROPROFILE.equals(getLibrary()))) { | ||
| supportingFiles.add(new SupportingFile("StringUtil.mustache", invokerFolder, "StringUtil.java")); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAICS this was only implemented for Jersey2 client in #4998 - can we mark this feature as included based on the API library used when generating?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great call out. I added this here because the ServerConfiguration and ServerVariable types were added to all java generators. I wonder if that was intentional and those files should only be added if Jersey is selected.
I can add this to the libraries option. We're currently not outputting library specific feature matrix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC it would be better to only add these files when jersey2 is used, CC @jirikuncar who authored the PR to confirm.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the parameterised server per endpoint support is only in jersey2.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm. I'm glad this happened because it made me realize that I screwed up the location of the
featureSetproperty. I'd designed it to be a property onGeneratorMetadataalongsidegetLibraryFeatures, but for some reason I made the property onGeneratorMetadataandDefaultCodegen.I'll leave this option where it is now on this PR, add a TODO and move the
supportingFilesadditions to only occur when jersey is selected… then I'll open another PR to movefeatureSetstogeneratorMetadataand include the library-specific option in that PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a support for global server URL generation in all Java clients, that can be used instead of
basePath. Additionally Jersey2 has support for server URL configuration per endpoint.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was not clear. There are actually 2 features to track:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, we probably need a
GlobalFeature.ParameterizedServerPerOperation?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I created #5402 to track adding another feature for per-operation server variables.