Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2021. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@molnargab
Copy link
Contributor

#228: This fixes a couple of file reference issues, e.g. upper cased file names or hard-coded path separators.

Though Mono provides a flag to enable backslash as a separator, I think it's more robust to rely on the runtime.

So far the build isn't successful, there seem to be some issue with resolving Gendarme.Rules.Maintanability.dll on Mono 3.12, though I was able to build it with MonoDevelop for Mono 3.2.8 (needed to upgrade to 3.12 in order to fix some failed tests with XmlSerialization).

I think it's safe to merge these changes already, as they're transparent for Windows builds.

@molnargab molnargab changed the title [WIP] Prerequisites for Mono build [WIP] Prerequisites for Mono build (#228) Feb 13, 2015
@molnargab molnargab changed the title [WIP] Prerequisites for Mono build (#228) [WIP] Prerequisites for Mono build Feb 13, 2015
@sawilde
Copy link
Member

sawilde commented Feb 14, 2015

@molnargab as it says [wip], are you intending to add more to it before it's fully ready for a merge?

@molnargab
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think I can't add anything else for now. WIP is meant to indicate that the build is not yet successful.

@sawilde
Copy link
Member

sawilde commented Feb 14, 2015

Okay - I am just wondering if we need it on the main repo yet if the work is not yet ready - it builds so is safe to take according to the tests, but I didn't want to take stuff too early as you may have been using the PR as a build test against the build servers; a legitimate thing to do IMO.

sawilde added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2015
[WIP] Prerequisites for Mono build
@sawilde sawilde merged commit 3b4660d into OpenCover:master Feb 21, 2015
@molnargab molnargab deleted the gendarme_signer branch February 21, 2015 14:09
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants