Skip to content

getApproved require the given token ID exist #1256

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
nventuro merged 4 commits into from
Sep 6, 2018
Merged

getApproved require the given token ID exist #1256

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
c4fe2d3
getApproved require the given token ID exist
lamengao Aug 30, 2018
0e6d2ba
Merge branch 'master' into erc721-getApproved
Sep 6, 2018
b25e67e
missing commit from merge
Sep 6, 2018
7d62c0c
clarify the test descriptions
Sep 6, 2018
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
clarify the test descriptions
  • Loading branch information
Leo Arias committed Sep 6, 2018
commit 7d62c0c10267a28726d0f43f5698f072d5aabfed
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions test/token/ERC721/ERC721MintBurn.behavior.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -84,14 +84,14 @@ function shouldBehaveLikeMintAndBurnERC721 (accounts) {
});
});

describe('when there is a previous approval', function () {
describe('when there is a previous approval burned', function () {
beforeEach(async function () {
await this.token.approve(accounts[1], tokenId, { from: sender });
const result = await this.token.burn(tokenId, { from: sender });
logs = result.logs;
});

context('when the token ID does not exist', function () {
context('getApproved', function () {
it('reverts', async function () {
Copy link
Contributor

@nventuro nventuro Aug 30, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find the current phrasing a bit confusing: maybe we could merge the context and it blocks, and change the description to something like 'causes getApproved to revert'?

We also may want to add a test block for getApproved, explicitly checking for this, though that could be considered part of #1148.

Copy link

@come-maiz come-maiz Sep 6, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nventuro I made a quick attempt at clarifying the descriptions. And added a comment on #1148 to not forget about the getApproved tests.

await assertRevert(this.token.getApproved(tokenId));
});
Expand Down