Skip to content

Conversation

@JGcarv
Copy link
Contributor

@JGcarv JGcarv commented Aug 17, 2017

Simple base contract that allows child contracts to handle tokens.

It can be used for contracts that expect to receive any token(wallets, vaults, exchanges, etc) and as a safe measure to avoid locking tokens in a unprepared contract.

@frangio
Copy link
Contributor

frangio commented Aug 19, 2017

This is a pretty cool idea @JGcarv!

What was the rationale for adding the tokenName functions?

@JGcarv
Copy link
Contributor Author

JGcarv commented Aug 19, 2017 via email

@frangio
Copy link
Contributor

frangio commented Aug 24, 2017

Yeah, I think the user- friendly names should be resolved elsewhere, e.g. by using ENS or at the application level.

@JGcarv JGcarv force-pushed the feature/tokenWallet branch from 27755c8 to 13f0fe4 Compare August 25, 2017 18:02
@JGcarv
Copy link
Contributor Author

JGcarv commented Aug 25, 2017

Agreed! Just removed the functions that used tokenName and rebased the branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants