Skip to content

Conversation

ndyashas
Copy link
Contributor

The current API is such that it takes in a (list of) file(s) as input. However,
when embedding Pyverilog in another python libraries/code, it would be helpful
to pass python strings directly to the API rather than files.

This feature works along with the current implementation in such a way that
the user can either continue passing files as inputs as in the existing API
or pass Verilog code in python strings to the API.

Addresses #63

…iles.

The current API is such that it takes in a (list of) file(s) as input. However,
when embedding Pyverilog in aother python libraries/code, it would be helpful
to pass python sitrings directly to the API rather than files.

This feature works along with the current implementation in such a way that
the user can either continue passing files as inputs as in the existing API
or pass verilog code in python strings to the API.
@shtaxxx shtaxxx merged commit b450a00 into PyHDI:develop Dec 14, 2020
@shtaxxx
Copy link
Member

shtaxxx commented Dec 14, 2020

I'm sorry for the very long delay in my response. Thank you very much for your interesting and useful request. I am very pleased to pull your request!

@ndyashas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you very much. The library has really helped a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants