Implemented the 'Contains' operator#410
Merged
benjchristensen merged 3 commits intoReactiveX:masterfrom Oct 9, 2013
Merged
Conversation
|
RxJava-pull-requests #315 SUCCESS |
|
RxJava-pull-requests #316 SUCCESS |
Contributor
|
@cloudbees-pull-request-builder glad to see you work again ;-) @zsxwing Nice. I also think that we don't need an overload with a comparator, because one can simply use o.exists(new Func1<T, Boolean>() {
public Boolean call(T a) {
// check if a is "equal" to the desired element using custom comparison strategy
}
}); |
benjchristensen
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2013
Implemented the 'Contains' operator
rickbw
pushed a commit
to rickbw/RxJava
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2014
Implemented the 'Contains' operator
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I implemented the
Containsoperator #31. I saw the discussion about thedistinctoperator #395, so I did not implement the comparator override. Please take a look. Thanks!