Skip to content

Conversation

@rodrigopavezi
Copy link
Member

@rodrigopavezi rodrigopavezi commented Dec 18, 2024

Changes

feat: Add modal for Lit Protocol signature requirement in invoice dashboard

Fixes #249

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a modal dialog for user signature prompts when accessing encrypted invoice details.
    • Enhanced flexibility in loading requests with updated method parameters.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of session signatures based on local storage items.
  • Style

    • Updated styles for the modal content to enhance user experience.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the view-requests.svelte file to introduce a modal dialog that explains the need for a Lit Protocol signature. It enhances user interaction by providing context when a session signature is required. The implementation allows for more flexible handling of account information in the loadRequests function and introduces a new loadSessionSignatures variable to control the visibility of the modal.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte - Added loadSessionSignatures variable
- Updated loadRequests function signature to accept undefined for currentAccount
- Imported Modal component
- Added modal logic for session signature explanation

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Explain Lit Protocol Signature Reason [#249]
Provide Dialog for Signature Context

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: lit encryption issues #264: This PR addresses improvements in wallet management and session handling, which are directly related to the changes made in the view-requests.svelte file regarding session signatures and user interaction.
  • fix: lit and wallet issues #265: This PR enhances wallet connection handling and improves the loadRequests function, which aligns with the modifications made in the main PR to the loadRequests function's signature and its handling of account states.

Suggested reviewers

  • MantisClone
  • sstefdev

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (1)

Line range hint 388-415: Enhance error handling and state management

The Lit Protocol signature flow implementation has several areas for improvement:

  1. Add user feedback for signature rejection
  2. Handle localStorage access errors
  3. Prevent potential race conditions with loadSessionSignatures state

Consider applying these improvements:

 const loadRequests = async (sliderValue: string, currentAccount: GetAccountReturnType | undefined, currentRequestNetwork: RequestNetwork | undefined | null) => {
   if (!currentAccount?.address || !currentRequestNetwork || !cipherProvider) return;

   loading = true;
   if (sliderValue === "on") {
     try {
       const signer = await getEthersSigner(wagmiConfig);
       if (signer && currentAccount?.address) {
-        loadSessionSignatures = localStorage?.getItem("lit-wallet-sig") === null;
+        try {
+          loadSessionSignatures = localStorage?.getItem("lit-wallet-sig") === null;
+        } catch (error) {
+          console.error("Failed to access localStorage:", error);
+          loadSessionSignatures = true;
+        }
         await cipherProvider?.getSessionSignatures(signer, currentAccount.address, window.location.host, "Sign in to Lit Protocol through Request Network");
         cipherProvider?.enableDecryption(true);
-        localStorage?.setItem("isDecryptionEnabled", JSON.stringify(true));
+        try {
+          localStorage?.setItem("isDecryptionEnabled", JSON.stringify(true));
+        } catch (error) {
+          console.error("Failed to save to localStorage:", error);
+        }
       }
     } catch (error) {
       console.error("Failed to enable decryption:", error);
-      toast.error("Failed to enable decryption.");
+      toast.error("Failed to enable decryption.", {
+        description: error instanceof Error && error.message === "User rejected signature" 
+          ? "Please approve the signature request to access encrypted invoices."
+          : "An unexpected error occurred while enabling decryption.",
+      });
       loading = false;
       return;
     } finally {
       loadSessionSignatures = false;
     }
   } else {
     cipherProvider?.enableDecryption(false);
-    localStorage?.setItem("isDecryptionEnabled", JSON.stringify(false));
+    try {
+      localStorage?.setItem("isDecryptionEnabled", JSON.stringify(false));
+    } catch (error) {
+      console.error("Failed to save to localStorage:", error);
+    }
   }
   await getRequests(currentAccount, currentRequestNetwork);
   loading = false;
 };
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (2)

423-436: Enhance modal content for better user guidance

While the modal effectively explains the basic purpose, it could provide more comprehensive information to help users make an informed decision.

Consider enhancing the modal content:

 <Modal
   config={config}
   isOpen={true}
   title="Lit Protocol Signature Required"
 >
   <div class="modal-content">
-    <p>This signature is required only once and will allow you to:</p>
+    <p>A one-time signature is required to enable secure access to encrypted invoice details through Lit Protocol.</p>
+    <p>By signing, you will be able to:</p>
     <ul>
-      <li>Access encrypted invoice details</li>
+      <li>View confidential invoice information securely</li>
+      <li>Maintain privacy of sensitive business data</li>
+      <li>Access encrypted attachments and notes</li>
     </ul>
+    <p class="modal-note">Note: This signature is only required once per browser session and does not incur any gas fees.</p>
   </div>
 </Modal>

1059-1072: Enhance modal styling for better readability

The current styling is functional but could be improved for better visual hierarchy and user experience.

Consider applying these styling enhancements:

 .modal-content {
   padding: 1rem;
+  line-height: 1.5;
 }
 
+.modal-content p {
+  margin-bottom: 1rem;
+  color: #1F2937;
+}
+
+.modal-note {
+  margin-top: 1rem;
+  font-size: 0.875rem;
+  color: #6B7280;
+  font-style: italic;
+}
+
 .modal-content ul {
   list-style-type: disc;
   margin-left: 1.5rem;
   margin-top: 0.5rem;
+  margin-bottom: 1rem;
 }
 
 .modal-content li {
   margin-bottom: 0.5rem;
-  color: #4B5563;
+  color: #374151;
+  font-size: 0.9375rem;
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a24e463 and 56bff5e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (1)

19-19: LGTM: Clean implementation of Modal component integration

The Modal import and state variable declaration are well-organized and follow the component's existing patterns.

Also applies to: 94-94

Copy link
Member

@MantisClone MantisClone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved 👍 contingent on comment resolution 🚧

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (3)

Line range hint 388-407: Enhance error handling in loadRequests function.

While the function logic is correct, the error handling could be improved:

  1. The error message "Failed to enable decryption" doesn't provide enough context about what went wrong
  2. The catch block swallows the original error details

Consider this improvement:

 } catch (error) {
   console.error("Failed to enable decryption:", error);
-  toast.error("Failed to enable decryption.");
+  toast.error("Failed to enable decryption", {
+    description: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error),
+    action: {
+      label: "X",
+      onClick: () => console.info("Close"),
+    },
+  });
   loading = false;
   return;
 }

423-436: Enhance the modal content for better user understanding.

While the modal implementation is correct, the content could be more informative about the security implications and purpose of the Lit Protocol signature.

Consider this improvement:

       <div class="modal-content">
-        <p>This signature is required only once per session and will allow you to:</p>
+        <p>This secure signature is required only once per session. By signing, you:</p>
         <ul>
-          <li>Access encrypted invoice details</li>
+          <li>Verify your identity to access encrypted invoice details</li>
+          <li>Enable secure decryption of sensitive invoice information</li>
+          <li>Maintain privacy of your invoice data through Lit Protocol</li>
         </ul>
+        <p class="security-note">Your signature never leaves your wallet and is used only for authentication.</p>
       </div>

1059-1072: Align modal styles with the theme configuration.

The modal styles could be improved by using the theme colors from the config.

Consider this improvement:

 .modal-content {
   padding: 1rem;
 }

 .modal-content ul {
   list-style-type: disc;
   margin-left: 1.5rem;
   margin-top: 0.5rem;
 }

 .modal-content li {
   margin-bottom: 0.5rem;
-  color: #4B5563;
+  color: var(--secondaryColor);
 }

+.security-note {
+  margin-top: 1rem;
+  padding: 0.5rem;
+  border-radius: 0.25rem;
+  background-color: #F3F4F6;
+  color: var(--mainColor);
+  font-size: 0.875rem;
+}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 56bff5e and 6207d03.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (1)

19-19: LGTM: Clean import and state variable declaration.

The Modal component import and loadSessionSignatures state variable are properly declared.

Also applies to: 94-94

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add modal for telling user that he needs to sign with Lit

3 participants