Skip to content

Conversation

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Summary

This PR adds comprehensive documentation for the DelayDiffEq.jl solver API, following the same structure and style as OrdinaryDiffEq.jl to maintain consistency across the SciML ecosystem.

Changes

  • Added docs/ directory with Documenter.jl setup
  • Created solver API reference page explaining the MethodOfSteps algorithm
  • Included algorithm selection guide for different problem types (stiff/non-stiff)
  • Added performance tips and usage examples
  • Set up GitHub Actions workflow for automatic documentation building and deployment

Documentation Structure

The documentation follows the pattern established by OrdinaryDiffEq.jl:

  • Clear explanation of the main algorithm (MethodOfSteps)
  • Algorithm properties and options
  • Recommended solvers for different scenarios
  • Performance tips and best practices

Test Plan

  • Documentation builds successfully with julia --project=docs/ docs/make.jl
  • All code examples in the documentation run without errors
  • Links to external resources are valid
  • Documentation deploys correctly to GitHub Pages

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

This commit adds comprehensive documentation for the DelayDiffEq.jl solver API,
similar to the documentation structure in OrdinaryDiffEq.jl. The documentation
includes:

- A new docs/ directory with Documenter.jl setup
- Solver API reference page explaining MethodOfSteps algorithm
- Algorithm selection guide for different problem types
- Performance tips and usage examples
- GitHub Actions workflow for automatic documentation building

The documentation follows the same structure and style as OrdinaryDiffEq.jl
to maintain consistency across the SciML ecosystem.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 29cd4b0 into master Jul 23, 2025
19 of 27 checks passed
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the add-solver-api-docs branch July 23, 2025 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants