Skip to content

fix(deps): update rust crate rand to 0.10.0#175

Merged
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/rand-0.x
Apr 4, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): update rust crate rand to 0.10.0#175
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/rand-0.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented Feb 8, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
rand (source) dependencies minor 0.9.00.10.0

Release Notes

rust-random/rand (rand)

v0.10.0

Compare Source

Changes
  • The dependency on rand_chacha has been replaced with a dependency on chacha20. This changes the implementation behind StdRng, but the output remains the same. There may be some API breakage when using the ChaCha-types directly as these are now the ones in chacha20 instead of rand_chacha (#​1642).
  • Rename fns IndexedRandom::choose_multiple -> sample, choose_multiple_array -> sample_array, choose_multiple_weighted -> sample_weighted, struct SliceChooseIter -> IndexedSamples and fns IteratorRandom::choose_multiple -> sample, choose_multiple_fill -> sample_fill (#​1632)
  • Use Edition 2024 and MSRV 1.85 (#​1653)
  • Let Fill be implemented for element types, not sliceable types (#​1652)
  • Fix OsError::raw_os_error on UEFI targets by returning Option<usize> (#​1665)
  • Replace fn TryRngCore::read_adapter(..) -> RngReadAdapter with simpler struct RngReader (#​1669)
  • Remove fns SeedableRng::from_os_rng, try_from_os_rng (#​1674)
  • Remove Clone support for StdRng, ReseedingRng (#​1677)
  • Use postcard instead of bincode to test the serde feature (#​1693)
  • Avoid excessive allocation in IteratorRandom::sample when amount is much larger than iterator size (#​1695)
  • Rename os_rng -> sys_rng, OsRng -> SysRng, OsError -> SysError (#​1697)
  • Rename Rng -> RngExt as upstream rand_core has renamed RngCore -> Rng (#​1717)
Additions
  • Add fns IndexedRandom::choose_iter, choose_weighted_iter (#​1632)
  • Pub export Xoshiro128PlusPlus, Xoshiro256PlusPlus prngs (#​1649)
  • Pub export ChaCha8Rng, ChaCha12Rng, ChaCha20Rng behind chacha feature (#​1659)
  • Fn rand::make_rng() -> R where R: SeedableRng (#​1734)
Removals

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/rand-0.x branch 5 times, most recently from 3dac19d to 512130b Compare February 18, 2026 09:38
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/rand-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from d66b853 to c5af4d8 Compare February 23, 2026 23:42
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/rand-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from d3561bc to cc93c7c Compare March 3, 2026 14:08
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/rand-0.x branch 4 times, most recently from f4cd1b0 to 116c360 Compare March 18, 2026 16:37
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/rand-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from d83c7ed to 277cab2 Compare March 31, 2026 21:51
@codacy-production
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codacy-production Bot commented Mar 31, 2026

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity · 0 duplication

Metric Results
Complexity 0
Duplication 0

View in Codacy

TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/rand-0.x branch from 277cab2 to 3064f08 Compare April 3, 2026 12:51
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/rand-0.x branch from 3064f08 to bf4e76c Compare April 4, 2026 02:13
@renovate renovate Bot merged commit 8b35204 into main Apr 4, 2026
7 checks passed
@renovate renovate Bot deleted the renovate/rand-0.x branch April 4, 2026 04:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants