Adjust rich-text source mentions in docs #10534
Conversation
ellatrix
added
the
[Feature] Rich Text
tofumatt
left a comment
tofumatt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense to me! I suggested a tweak but feel free to make it if it makes sense, then merge.
docs/block-api/attributes.md
Outdated
| // " vel urna." | ||
| // ] | ||
| // } | ||
| // { "content": "<p>Quoted text</p><p>And more</p>" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe using an example like "<p>Quoted text</p><p>Second line</p>" might make this a bit more immediately obvious.
|
It's tricky to assign proper milestone :D As it is synced with Gutenberg handbook up to 15 minutes after the merge. |
|
@gziolo Not sure I understand... could you elaborate? |
|
Please check https://wordpress.org/gutenberg/handbook/block-api/#attributes-optional - your changes are already there. The flow for documentation is not ideal. That's why we still put milestone according to the plugin release schedule. Next release is 4.1 as 4.0-RC can get only patches before it gets out. Ideally, Gutenberg handbook should show docs for 3.9 release, 4.0-RC as an option and |
|
BTW, @pento @youknowriad - do we have anything planned to fix the issue with the content of Gutenberg handbook as 5.0 goes out? |
|
Wow. Before it's even merged? |
I merged PR, if this is what you ask :) |
Description
After #10439, adjusts the docs to suggest 'html' source instead of 'rich-text'.
How has this been tested?
Screenshots
Types of changes
Checklist: