-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
Element: Fix serializer handling of multiple distinct contexts #21156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6313fad
Element: Fix serializer handling of multiple distinct contexts
aduth 90dacf0
Element: Add non-mixed test case for nested context
aduth 014e884
Element: Add testt case for rendering Context directly
aduth 947a58f
Element: Guard property access to context consumer `_context`
aduth c64b80a
Try common Map implementation
aduth 621789b
Try avoiding explicit argument to constructor
aduth File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next
Next commit
Element: Fix serializer handling of multiple distinct contexts
- Loading branch information
commit 6313fad188e25569ed6cb54035e99439fe910299
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see that e2e tests fail for blocks that have nesting. I'm wondering if there should be another unit tests that replicate how
InnerBlocksworks, if I follow it properly it would be something like:Although, I don't see any reason why it would make any difference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not really sure what's going on with the end-to-end tests, to be honest. I've not been able to reproduce those same failures in my local environment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added a test case for this in 90dacf0 for good measure. It passes, as expected. Still struggling with the end-to-end tests in Travis.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've just realized that we use one shared context for
InnerBlocksso the following might be closer to the use case that fails on Travis:I don't think it's much different from a similar existing test though. I can't think of any reason why it fails on Travis :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh no :(