Skip to content

Remove synced blocks from lastBlockInserted #52558

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
jeryj merged 3 commits into from
Jul 13, 2023
Merged

Remove synced blocks from lastBlockInserted #52558

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
3e91aaf
lastBlockInserted: Remove REPLACE_INNER_BLOCKS
scruffian Jul 12, 2023
d05c863
update test
scruffian Jul 12, 2023
109384e
update test
scruffian Jul 13, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion packages/block-editor/src/store/reducer.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1855,7 +1855,6 @@ export function lastBlockInserted( state = {}, action ) {
switch ( action.type ) {
case 'INSERT_BLOCKS':
case 'REPLACE_BLOCKS':
case 'REPLACE_INNER_BLOCKS':
if ( ! action.blocks.length ) {
return state;
}
Expand Down
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions packages/block-editor/src/store/test/reducer.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3328,7 +3328,7 @@ describe( 'state', () => {
expect( state.clientIds ).toEqual( [ clientIdOne, clientIdTwo ] );
} );

it( 'should return client ids of all blocks when inner blocks are replaced with REPLACE_INNER_BLOCKS', () => {
it( 'should not return client ids of all blocks when inner blocks are replaced with REPLACE_INNER_BLOCKS', () => {
Copy link
Contributor

@draganescu draganescu Jul 12, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we in any way make this a positive assertion?

Copy link
Contributor

@getdave getdave Jul 12, 2023 •
edited by draganescu
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Put some initial blocks in state. Freeze them. Run the reducer function. Check the blocks in state are the same.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@scruffian scruffian Jul 13, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've updated the test. Does this look better?

Copy link
Contributor

@draganescu draganescu Jul 14, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes thank you so much 🙏🏻

const clientIdOne = '62bfef6e-d5e9-43ba-b7f9-c77cf354141f';
const clientIdTwo = '9db792c6-a25a-495d-adbd-97d56a4c4189';

Expand All @@ -3346,7 +3346,10 @@ describe( 'state', () => {

const state = lastBlockInserted( {}, action );

expect( state.clientIds ).toEqual( [ clientIdOne, clientIdTwo ] );
expect( state.clientIds ).not.toEqual( [
clientIdOne,
clientIdTwo,
] );
} );

it( 'should return empty state if last block inserted is called with action RESET_BLOCKS', () => {
Expand Down