Skip to content

Update package-lock.json for fsevents following #6792 #6815

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
gziolo merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2018
Merged

Update package-lock.json for fsevents following #6792 #6815

gziolo merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2018

Conversation

@ntwb
Copy link
Member

@ntwb ntwb commented May 18, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Description

This is a follow up for package-lock.json following the fsevents change in #6792

How has this been tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

Checklist:

  • My code is tested.
  • My code follows the WordPress code style.
  • My code follows the accessibility standards.
  • My code has proper inline documentation.

@ntwb ntwb added the [Type] Build Tooling Issues or PRs related to build tooling label May 18, 2018
@ntwb ntwb requested a review from gziolo May 18, 2018 08:32
@gziolo gziolo mentioned this pull request May 18, 2018
Closed
4 tasks
gziolo
gziolo approved these changes May 18, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@gziolo gziolo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@gziolo gziolo added this to the 2.9 milestone May 18, 2018
@gziolo gziolo merged commit 04a839a into master May 18, 2018
@gziolo gziolo deleted the fsevents-lock-file-update branch May 18, 2018 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gziolo gziolo gziolo approved these changes

Assignees

@gziolo gziolo

Labels

[Type] Build Tooling Issues or PRs related to build tooling

Projects

None yet

Milestone

2.9

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ntwb @gziolo