Skip to content

Conversation

@leahkoerper
Copy link
Contributor

I made some formatting consistency tweaks to @michelleweber's fine work (from #7588) and added some bold emphasis that I believe was supposed to be there in the original PR. Props also to @karmatosed.

I made some formatting consistency tweaks to @michelleweber's fine work and added some bold emphasis that I believe was supposed to be there in the original PR. Props also to @karmatosed.
@leahkoerper
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's been pointed out to me that perhaps using the quote markdown is not technically correct for all the example text. My intention was to delineate them more because I found it hard to parse particularly in the section about bulleted lists. The lists themselves stood out, but the intro text before the list (which was also part of each example) blended right into the guidelines themselves. Is there a better strategy to clarify without using quote markdown?

@danielbachhuber danielbachhuber added the Needs Copy Review Needs review of user-facing copy (language, phrasing) label Aug 22, 2018
@chrisvanpatten chrisvanpatten added the [Type] Developer Documentation Documentation for developers label Nov 8, 2018
@tofumatt tofumatt self-requested a review November 12, 2018 22:18
Copy link
Member

@tofumatt tofumatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These improvements are solid and I think the quotes make everything more readable, so I'm for them. I'm going to merge this because it's an improvement; sorry it took ages to get to 😓

@tofumatt tofumatt merged commit 3ff9890 into WordPress:master Nov 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Copy Review Needs review of user-facing copy (language, phrasing) [Type] Developer Documentation Documentation for developers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants