Skip to content

Conversation

@pbruski
Copy link

@pbruski pbruski commented Jan 22, 2016

I am submitting this on behalf of Atlassian, the appropriate CCLAs are in place.

We have that code running in production and we didn't have any problems reports.
I assumed rather strict backward compatibility and interoperability requirements, not sure if that's needed. Well, at least the interoperability should be there.
In any case, it's easier to have them removed than to implement them as an afterthought.

@jbonofre jbonofre self-requested a review October 17, 2023 09:23
@jbonofre
Copy link
Member

IMHO, it should be better to have an http option to support openwire format. Something like:

  <transportConnector name="http" uri="http://0.0.0.0:1234?openwireSerializatrionEnabled=true" />

It would allow to support current marshalling and openwire marshalling.

NB: if you don't reply to this PR quickly, this one will be closed.

@mattrpav
Copy link
Contributor

mattrpav commented Apr 18, 2024

<transportConnector name="http" uri="http://0.0.0.0:1234?openwireSerializatrionEnabled=true" />

or perhaps a wireformat.type=[xstream | openwire], etc.

I think it would be good to deprecate xstream usage and either update the openwire generator to include static generated XML marshaling, or just favor openwire over http.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants