-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 407
Implement Sorted Writes #871
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
vinjai
wants to merge
7
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
vinjai:feature/sort-writes
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
73ec535
Implement Sorted Writes
vinjai 64b8975
Refactored and added more tests for sorting
vinjai 76f9894
Added more tests
vinjai bd600d6
Added comments
vinjai 5029e71
Updated comments
vinjai 793c99f
Added warning for unsupported Transforms
vinjai b6345ba
Added More Description
vinjai File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ | ||
| # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one | ||
| # or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file | ||
| # distributed with this work for additional information | ||
| # regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file | ||
| # to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the | ||
| # "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance | ||
| # with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
| # | ||
| # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
| # | ||
| # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, | ||
| # software distributed under the License is distributed on an | ||
| # "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY | ||
| # KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the | ||
| # specific language governing permissions and limitations | ||
| # under the License. | ||
| # pylint:disable=redefined-outer-name | ||
| from typing import List, Tuple | ||
|
|
||
| import pyarrow as pa | ||
|
|
||
| from pyiceberg.table.sorting import NullOrder, SortDirection, SortField | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class PyArrowSortOptions: | ||
| sort_direction: str | ||
| null_order: str | ||
|
|
||
| def __init__(self, sort_direction: str = "ascending", null_order: str = "at_end"): | ||
| if sort_direction not in ("ascending", "descending"): | ||
| raise ValueError('Sort Direction should be one of ["ascending","descending"]') | ||
| if null_order not in ("at_start", "at_end"): | ||
| raise ValueError('Sort Null Order should be one of ["at_start","at_end"]') | ||
|
|
||
| self.sort_direction = sort_direction | ||
| self.null_order = null_order | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def convert_sort_field_to_pyarrow_sort_options(sort_field: SortField) -> PyArrowSortOptions: | ||
| """ | ||
| Convert an Iceberg Table Sort Field to Arrow Sort Options. | ||
|
|
||
| Args: | ||
| sort_field (SortField): Source Iceberg Sort Field to be converted | ||
|
|
||
| Returns: | ||
| PyArrowOptions: PyArrowOptions format for the input Sort Field | ||
| """ | ||
| pyarrow_sort_direction = {SortDirection.ASC: "ascending", SortDirection.DESC: "descending"} | ||
| pyarrow_null_ordering = {NullOrder.NULLS_LAST: "at_end", NullOrder.NULLS_FIRST: "at_start"} | ||
| return PyArrowSortOptions( | ||
| pyarrow_sort_direction.get(sort_field.direction, "ascending"), | ||
| pyarrow_null_ordering.get(sort_field.null_order, "at_end"), | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def get_sort_indices_arrow_table(arrow_table: pa.Table, sort_seq: List[Tuple[str, PyArrowSortOptions]]) -> List[int]: | ||
| """ | ||
| Return the indices that would sort the input arrow table. | ||
|
|
||
| This function computes an array of indices that define a stable sort of the input arrow_table | ||
|
|
||
| Currently, pyarrow sort_indices function doesn't accept different null ordering across multiple keys | ||
| To make sure, we are able to sort null orders across multiple keys: | ||
| 1. Utilize a stable sort algo (e.g. pyarrow sort indices) | ||
| 2. Sort on the last key first and reverse iterate sort to the first key. | ||
|
|
||
| For instance: | ||
| If the sorting is defined on age asc and then name desc, the sorting can be decomposed into single key stable | ||
| sorts in the following way: | ||
| - first sort by name desc | ||
| - then sort by age asc | ||
|
|
||
| Using a stable sort, we can guarantee that the output would be same across different order keys. | ||
|
|
||
| Pyarrow sort_indices function is stable as mentioned in the doc: https://arrow.apache.org/docs/python/generated/pyarrow.compute.sort_indices.html | ||
|
|
||
| Args: | ||
| arrow_table (pa.Table): Input table to be sorted | ||
| sort_seq: Seq of PyArrowOptions to apply sorting | ||
|
|
||
| Returns: | ||
| List[int]: Indices of the arrow table for sorting | ||
| """ | ||
| import pyarrow as pa | ||
|
|
||
| index_column_name = "__idx__pyarrow_sort__" | ||
| cols = set(arrow_table.column_names) | ||
|
|
||
| while index_column_name in cols: | ||
| index_column_name = f"{index_column_name}_1" | ||
|
|
||
| sorted_table: pa.Table = arrow_table.add_column(0, index_column_name, [list(range(len(arrow_table)))]) | ||
|
|
||
| for col_name, _ in sort_seq: | ||
| if col_name not in cols: | ||
| raise ValueError( | ||
| f"{col_name} not found in arrow table. Expected one of [{','.join([col_name for col_name, _ in cols])}]" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| for col_name, sort_options in sort_seq[::-1]: | ||
| sorted_table = sorted_table.take( | ||
| # This function works because pyarrow sort_indices function is stable. | ||
| # As mentioned in the docs: https://arrow.apache.org/docs/python/generated/pyarrow.compute.sort_indices.html | ||
| pa.compute.sort_indices( | ||
| sorted_table, sort_keys=[(col_name, sort_options.sort_direction)], null_placement=sort_options.null_order | ||
| ) | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| return sorted_table[index_column_name].to_pylist() | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just wanted to clarify on the separate implementation for sort_indices other than the one provided by pyarrow.
This is because pyarrow sort_indices or Sort Options only supports one order for null placement across keys.
More details here:
While, the iceberg spec doesn't discriminate of having different null ordering across keys: https://iceberg.apache.org/spec/#sort-orders
This function specifically helps to implement the above functionality by sorting across keys and utilizing the stable nature of the sort_indices algo from pyarrow.
We can raise another issue to improve the performance of this function.
In future, if pyarrow sort_indices does support different null ordering across, we can mark this function as obsolete and keep the implementation clean in the iceberg table append and overwrite methods.