Skip to content

Conversation

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to publish Apache Spark 3.5.6 to docker registry

Why are the changes needed?

To provide a docker image of Apache Spark 3.5.6.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Manual review.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

I am not sure if I did this correctly. Would you mind taking a look please, @dongjoon-hyun @Yikun ?

Copy link
Member

@Yikun Yikun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems good, CI failure because the file not ready yet, let's retry.

For special tag see comments inline

Copy link
Member

@Yikun Yikun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unrelated: python3-java17, python3, latest, r, scala should also move from 3.5.5 to 4.0.0

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

unrelated: python3-java17, python3, latest, r, scala should also move from 3.5.5 to 4.0.0

For the above, here is a follow-up.

@Yikun
Copy link
Member

Yikun commented May 27, 2025

1478.4 + gpg --batch --keyserver hkps://keys.openpgp.org --recv-key 0FE4571297AB84440673665669600C8338F65970
1478.4 gpg: keybox '/tmp/tmp.RF1Rm9h7BD/pubring.kbx' created
1479.3 gpg: key 69600C8338F65970: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
1479.3 gpg: Total number processed: 1
1479.3 gpg:           w/o user IDs: 1
1479.3 + gpg --batch --verify spark.tgz.asc spark.tgz
1481.1 gpg: Signature made Fri 23 May 2025 06:49:54 AM UTC
1481.1 gpg:                using RSA key 0FE4571297AB84440673665669600C8338F65970
1481.1 gpg:                issuer "[email protected]"
1481.1 gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

@HyukjinKwon This should be done: #54 (comment) and retrigger jobs.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you!!

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM.

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun merged commit c264d48 into apache:master May 28, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants