Skip to content

Conversation

@yhuai
Copy link
Contributor

@yhuai yhuai commented Jun 29, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The analyzer rule for resolving using joins should respect the case sensitivity setting.

How was this patch tested?

New tests in ResolveNaturalJoinSuite

right: LogicalPlan,
joinType: JoinType,
joinNames: Seq[String],
condition: Option[Expression]) = {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These 5 lines are just formatting changes.

@brkyvz
Copy link
Contributor

brkyvz commented Jun 29, 2016

Just a single comment, otherwise LGTM. Thanks for addressing this so quickly!

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 29, 2016

Test build #61485 has finished for PR 13977 at commit e051a88.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 29, 2016

Test build #61483 has finished for PR 13977 at commit 52ba666.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@davies
Copy link
Contributor

davies commented Jun 29, 2016

LGTM,
Merging this into master and 2.0, thanks!

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2016
…d respect the case sensitivity setting.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The analyzer rule for resolving using joins should respect the case sensitivity setting.

## How was this patch tested?
New tests in ResolveNaturalJoinSuite

Author: Yin Huai <[email protected]>

Closes #13977 from yhuai/SPARK-16301.

(cherry picked from commit 8b5a8b2)
Signed-off-by: Davies Liu <[email protected]>
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 29, 2016

Test build #61491 has finished for PR 13977 at commit b5b5954.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 8b5a8b2 Jun 29, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants