[SPARK-16600][MLLib] fix some latex formula syntax error #14246
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
OK, especially if you've had a search for other similar latex issues. It probably doesn't even need a JIRA but OK. |
|
Test build #62460 has finished for PR 14246 at commit
|
Member
|
Merged to master, and again to 2.0 being strictly a minor doc fix. |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`\partial\x` ==> `\partial x`
`har{x_i}` ==> `hat{x_i}`
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: WeichenXu <[email protected]>
Closes #14246 from WeichenXu123/fix_formular_err.
(cherry picked from commit 8310c07)
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
\partial\x==>\partial xhar{x_i}==>hat{x_i}How was this patch tested?
N/A