Skip to content

Conversation

@brkyvz
Copy link
Contributor

@brkyvz brkyvz commented Dec 15, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

_to_seq wasn't imported.

How was this patch tested?

Added partitionBy to existing write path unit test

@brkyvz
Copy link
Contributor Author

brkyvz commented Dec 15, 2016

cc @tdas

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 15, 2016

Test build #70205 has finished for PR 16297 at commit e10627f.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@tdas
Copy link
Contributor

tdas commented Dec 15, 2016

LGTM, pending tests.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 15, 2016

Test build #70209 has finished for PR 16297 at commit cb54349.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@tdas
Copy link
Contributor

tdas commented Dec 15, 2016

Merging to master and 2.1

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2016
…q not defined

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`_to_seq` wasn't imported.

## How was this patch tested?

Added partitionBy to existing write path unit test

Author: Burak Yavuz <[email protected]>

Closes #16297 from brkyvz/SPARK-18888.
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 0917c8e Dec 15, 2016
uzadude pushed a commit to uzadude/spark that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2017
…q not defined

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`_to_seq` wasn't imported.

## How was this patch tested?

Added partitionBy to existing write path unit test

Author: Burak Yavuz <[email protected]>

Closes apache#16297 from brkyvz/SPARK-18888.
@brkyvz brkyvz deleted the SPARK-18888 branch February 3, 2019 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants